The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users

dc.contributor.authorTamati, Terrin N.
dc.contributor.authorPisoni, David B.
dc.contributor.authorMoberly, Aaron C.
dc.contributor.departmentOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-17T16:43:01Z
dc.date.available2023-04-17T16:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-17
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This preliminary research examined (a) the perception of two common sources of indexical variability in speech—regional dialects and foreign accents, and (b) the relation between indexical processing and sentence recognition among prelingually deaf, long-term cochlear implant (CI) users and normal-hearing (NH) peers. Method: Forty-three prelingually deaf adolescent and adult CI users and 44 NH peers completed a regional dialect categorization task, which consisted of identifying the region of origin of an unfamiliar talker from six dialect regions of the United States. They also completed an intelligibility rating task, which consisted of rating the intelligibility of short sentences produced by native and nonnative (foreign-accented) speakers of American English on a scale from 1 (not intelligible at all) to 7 (very intelligible). Individual performance was compared to demographic factors and sentence recognition scores. Results: Both CI and NH groups demonstrated difficulty with regional dialect categorization, but NH listeners significantly outperformed the CI users. In the intelligibility rating task, both CI and NH listeners rated foreign-accented sentences as less intelligible than native sentences; however, CI users perceived smaller differences in intelligibility between native and foreign-accented sentences. Sensitivity to accent differences was related to sentence recognition accuracy in CI users. Conclusions: Prelingually deaf, long-term CI users are sensitive to accent variability in speech, but less so than NH peers. Additionally, individual differences in CI users' sensitivity to indexical variability was related to sentence recognition abilities, suggesting a common source of difficulty in the perception and encoding of fine acoustic–phonetic details in speech.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.citationTamati TN, Pisoni DB, Moberly AC. The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;64(2):683-690. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00496en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32440
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Associationen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00496en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Researchen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCochlear implantationen_US
dc.subjectCochlear implantsen_US
dc.subjectPhoneticsen_US
dc.subjectSpeech intelligibilityen_US
dc.subjectSpeech perceptionen_US
dc.titleThe Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Usersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632473/en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
JSLHR-64-683.pdf
Size:
178.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: