Acceptability and Results of Dementia Screening Among Older Adults in the United States

Date
2018
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Bentham Science
Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To measure older adults acceptability of dementia screening and assess screening test results of a racially diverse sample of older primary care patients in the United States. DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study of primary care patients aged 65 and older. SETTING:

Urban and suburban primary care clinics in Indianapolis, Indiana, in 2008 to 2009. PARTICIPANTS:

Nine hundred fifty-four primary care patients without a documented diagnosis of dementia. MEASUREMENTS:

Community Screening Instrument for Dementia, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Telephone Instrument for Cognitive Screening. RESULTS:

Of the 954 study participants who consented to participate, 748 agreed to be screened for dementia and 206 refused screening. The overall response rate was 78.4%. The positive screen rate of the sample who agreed to screening was 10.2%. After adjusting for demographic differences the following characteristics were still associated with increased likelihood of screening positive for dementia: age, male sex, and lower education. Patients who believed that they had more memory problems than other people of their age were also more likely to screen positive for dementia. CONCLUSION:

Age and perceived problems with memory are associated with screening positive for dementia in primary care.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
Harrawood, A., Fowler, N. R., Perkins, A. J., LaMantia, M. A., & Boustani, M. A. (2018). Acceptability and Results of Dementia Screening Among Older Adults in the United States. Current Alzheimer research, 15(1), 51–55. doi:10.2174/1567205014666170908100905
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Current Alzheimer Research
Rights
Publisher Policy
Source
PMC
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Author's manuscript
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}