Prophylactic Absorbable Antibiotic Beads for High-risk, Implant-based Prepectoral Reconstruction
dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Shahnur | |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jason T. C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Roth, Dylan | |
dc.contributor.author | Sinha, Mithun | |
dc.contributor.author | Fisher, Carla | |
dc.contributor.author | Fan, Betty | |
dc.contributor.author | Imeokparia, Folasade | |
dc.contributor.author | Ludwig, Kandice | |
dc.contributor.author | Lester, Mary E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hassanein, Aladdin H. | |
dc.contributor.department | Surgery, School of Medicine | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-25T09:18:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-25T09:18:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-10-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | Infections are problematic in postmastectomy implant-based reconstruction with infection rates as high as 30%. Strategies to reduce the risk of infection have demonstrated various efficacies. A prolonged course of systemic, oral antibiotics has not shown evidence-based benefit. Although absorbable antibiotic beads have been described for orthopedic procedures and pressure wounds, their use has not been well studied during breast reconstruction, particularly for prepectoral implant placement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the selective use of prophylactic absorbable calcium sulfate antibiotic beads during high-risk implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients who underwent implant-based, prepectoral breast reconstruction between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed. Groups were divided into those who received antibiotic beads and those who did not. Outcome variables included postoperative infection at 90 days. A total of 148 patients (256 implants) were included: 15 patients (31 implants) who received biodegradable antibiotic beads and 133 patients (225 implants) in the control group. Patients who received antibiotic beads were more likely to have a history of infection (66.7%) compared with the control group (0%) (P < 0.01). Surgical site infection occurred in 3.2% of implants in the antibiotic bead group compared with 7.6%, but this did not reach statistical significance. The incidence of infection in high-risk patients who have absorbable antibiotic beads placed during the time of reconstruction seems to be normalized to the control group in this pilot study. We present a novel use of prophylactic absorbable antibiotic beads in prepectoral breast implant reconstruction. | |
dc.eprint.version | Final published version | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed S, Lee JTC, Roth D, et al. Prophylactic Absorbable Antibiotic Beads for High-risk, Implant-based Prepectoral Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11(10):e5353. Published 2023 Oct 16. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000005353 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/39458 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005353 | |
dc.relation.journal | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Global Open | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.source | PMC | |
dc.subject | Postmastectomy implant-based reconstructiInfectionson | |
dc.subject | Infection | |
dc.subject | Absorbable antibiotic beads | |
dc.title | Prophylactic Absorbable Antibiotic Beads for High-risk, Implant-based Prepectoral Reconstruction | |
dc.type | Article |