Detection of Illicit Drugs in Various Matrices Via Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction

dc.contributor.advisorGoodpaster, John
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Kymeri Elizabeth
dc.contributor.otherManicke, Nicholas
dc.contributor.otherDeiss, Frédérique
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-18T15:02:31Z
dc.date.available2019-07-18T15:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.degree.date2019en_US
dc.degree.disciplineChemistryen
dc.degree.grantorPurdue Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.S.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractIn Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction (Headspace SPME), a sample is heated to encourage a portion of the analyte into the headspace of a vial. A coated fiber is introduced into the sample headspace and the analyte is adsorbed onto the fiber coating. Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction (TV-SPME) is a technique that is derived from this technique. In TV-SPME, liquid samples are completely vaporized allowing for better adsorption and fewer matrix effects. This method does not require any sample preparation, utilizes minimal supplies and can be automated, making it both an efficient and cost-effective method. Chapter 1 will discuss the theory of SPME and TV-SPME. In Chapter 2, the detection of ɣ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and ɣ-butyrolactone (GBL) in beverages is discussed. The detection of these compounds in beverages is of importance because these drugs may be used to facilitate sexual assault. This crime utilizes substances that cause sedation and memory loss. The derivatization of GHB as well as the properties that make GHB difficult to detect will be discussed. Chapter 3 will discuss the detection of methamphetamine and amphetamine (as their trifluoroacetyl derivatives), GBL, and the trimethylsilyl derivative of GHB in human urine. Amphetamine is a metabolite of methamphetamine, therefore, both drugs should be identified within biological samples. GHB and GBL are metabolites of one another and interconvert when in aqueous solution. This interconversion will be discussed. Chapter 4 will cover method optimization of the Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction method. Analytes of interest for these analyses were methamphetamine, amphetamine, GHB, and GBL. The optimal extraction temperature ranging from 60-160°C of each drug will be discussed as well as why higher temperatures may not be suitable for this method. A limit of detection study for methamphetamine and amphetamine will also be covered. Chapter 5, the future work chapter, will discuss future analyses using the Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction method including the analysis of powder materials, plant material, and toxicological samples. Powder material will include the analysis of individual powdered drugs as well as realistic drug mixtures. Some analyses on individual powder samples has already been completed and will be shown. Plant material will include the analysis of naturally occurring compounds found in marijuana plants as well as synthetic cannabinoids. Toxicological samples will expand on previously mentioned urine samples to include drugs such as benzoylecgonine and THC-COOH.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/19903
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/2279
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectGas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometryen_US
dc.subjectSolid-Phase Microextractionen_US
dc.subjectDrugsen_US
dc.titleDetection of Illicit Drugs in Various Matrices Via Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextractionen_US
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Purdue University Thesis Davis 2019 FINAL.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: