Detection of Illicit Drugs in Various Matrices Via Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2019-08
Language
English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Chair
Degree
M.S.
Degree Year
2019
Department
Chemistry
Grantor
Purdue University
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract

In Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction (Headspace SPME), a sample is heated to encourage a portion of the analyte into the headspace of a vial. A coated fiber is introduced into the sample headspace and the analyte is adsorbed onto the fiber coating. Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction (TV-SPME) is a technique that is derived from this technique. In TV-SPME, liquid samples are completely vaporized allowing for better adsorption and fewer matrix effects. This method does not require any sample preparation, utilizes minimal supplies and can be automated, making it both an efficient and cost-effective method. Chapter 1 will discuss the theory of SPME and TV-SPME. In Chapter 2, the detection of ɣ-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) and ɣ-butyrolactone (GBL) in beverages is discussed. The detection of these compounds in beverages is of importance because these drugs may be used to facilitate sexual assault. This crime utilizes substances that cause sedation and memory loss. The derivatization of GHB as well as the properties that make GHB difficult to detect will be discussed. Chapter 3 will discuss the detection of methamphetamine and amphetamine (as their trifluoroacetyl derivatives), GBL, and the trimethylsilyl derivative of GHB in human urine. Amphetamine is a metabolite of methamphetamine, therefore, both drugs should be identified within biological samples. GHB and GBL are metabolites of one another and interconvert when in aqueous solution. This interconversion will be discussed. Chapter 4 will cover method optimization of the Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction method. Analytes of interest for these analyses were methamphetamine, amphetamine, GHB, and GBL. The optimal extraction temperature ranging from 60-160°C of each drug will be discussed as well as why higher temperatures may not be suitable for this method. A limit of detection study for methamphetamine and amphetamine will also be covered. Chapter 5, the future work chapter, will discuss future analyses using the Total Vaporization Solid-Phase Microextraction method including the analysis of powder materials, plant material, and toxicological samples. Powder material will include the analysis of individual powdered drugs as well as realistic drug mixtures. Some analyses on individual powder samples has already been completed and will be shown. Plant material will include the analysis of naturally occurring compounds found in marijuana plants as well as synthetic cannabinoids. Toxicological samples will expand on previously mentioned urine samples to include drugs such as benzoylecgonine and THC-COOH.

Description
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Thesis
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}