- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "transplant"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Comparison of Artificial Intelligence and Eyeball Method in the Detection of Fatty Liver Disease(2023-07-26) Catron, Evan J.; Passarelli, Robert P.; Danielle, Wilmes; Wei, Barry; Le, Thi M.U.; Li, Ping; Zhang, Wenjun; Lin, Jingmei; Melcher, Mark L.; Mihaylov, Plamen V.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Mangus, Robert S.; Ekser, BurcinBackground: Quantification of liver fat content relies on visual microscopic inspection of liver biopsies by pathologists. Their percent macrosteatosis (%MaS) estimation is vital in determining donor liver transplantability; however, the eyeball method may vary between observers. Overestimations of %MaS can potentially lead to the discard of viable donor livers. We hypothesize that artificial intelligence (AI) could be helpful in providing a more objective and accurate measurement of %MaS. Methods: Literature review identified HALO (image analysis) and U-Net (deep-learning) as high-accuracy AI programs capable of calculating %MaS in liver biopsies. We compared (i) an experienced pathologist’s and (ii) a transplant surgeon’s eyeball %MaS estimations from de-novo liver transplant (LT) biopsy samples taken 2h post-reperfusion to (iii) the HALO-calculated %MaS (Fig.1). 250 patients had undergone LT at Indiana University between 2020-2021, and 211 had sufficient data for inclusion. Each biopsy was digitized into 5 random non-overlapping tiles at 20x magnification (a total of 1,055 images). We used HALO software for analysis and set the minimum vacuole area to 10μm² to avoid the inclusion of microsteatosis. Microsteatosis was excluded by the pathologist and the surgeon by the eyeball method using the same 1,055 images. Each %MaS estimation was compared with early allograft dysfunction (EAD). EAD is defined by the presence of at least one of the following: INR >1.6 on postoperative day (POD) 7, total bilirubin >10mg/dL on POD7, or AST/ALT >2000IU/L within the first 7 days following LT. Results: Of 211 LTs, 42 (19.9%) had EAD. The mean %MaS estimation of pathologist and transplant surgeon were 6.3% (SD: 11.9%) and 3.2% (SD: 6.4%), respectively. HALO yielded a significantly lower mean %MaS of 2.6% (SD: 2.6%) than the pathologist’s eyeball method (p<0.001). The mean %MaS calculated by HALO was higher in EAD patients than in non-EAD (p=0.032), but this difference did not reach statistical significance in the pathologist’s estimation (p=0.069). Conclusions: Although mean %MaS measurements from all parties were mild (<10%), human eyeball estimations of %MaS were significantly higher than HALO’s %MaS. The HALO-calculated %MaS differed significantly between the EAD and non-EAD LTs which might suggest a possible correlation between the AI’s steatosis analysis and EAD outcomes. However, pathologic variables other than %MaS (necrosis or cholestasis) should be included in future analyses to determine whether %MaS is the dominant parameter predicting EAD. AI is a promising tool to quantify liver steatosis and will help pathologists and transplant surgeons predict liver transplant viability.Item Comparison of Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics in Cystic Fibrosis Patients Pre and Post-lung Transplant:(Sage, 2020-06-15) White, Shannon; Sakon, Colleen; Fitzgerald, Linda; Kam, Charissa; McDade, Erin; Wong, Alanna; School of EducationBackground: Vancomycin is commonly used to treat acute cystic fibrosis (CF) exacerbations associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Multiple studies have demonstrated pharmacokinetic differences of antimicrobials in the CF population. Very little data exist regarding pharmacokinetics postlung transplant, but 2 studies have noted changes in tobramycin pharmacokinetics. No such studies exist evaluating vancomycin in CF patients postlung transplant. Methods: A retrospective cohort review of CF patients who underwent lung transplantation and received vancomycin pre- and posttransplant was conducted. CF patients who underwent transplant between 2007 and 2016 at 4 medical centers throughout the United States were included. The primary endpoint was the change in elimination rate constant. The secondary endpoints were subgroup analyses of patients grouped by age, time posttransplant, and number of nephrotoxic medications. Results: A total of 25 patients were included, of which just under half were pediatric. Patients were significantly older and heavier posttransplant and had higher serum creatinine and number of nephrotoxic medications. The change in elimination rate constant from pre- to posttransplant was −0.50 hr−1 which was statistically significant (P < .001). This significant decrease was consistent among all subgroups of patients evaluated with the exception of pediatric patients. Conclusion: Vancomycin pharmacokinetics are significantly altered in CF patients in the posttransplant setting as evidenced by a decrease in elimination rate constant. This decrease may be related to a decrease in renal clearance and higher numbers of nephrotoxic medications posttransplant. Regardless, pretransplant vancomycin regimens may not predict appropriate posttransplant regimens.