- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Stereotyping"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Grades K-12 Curriculum Guide for Attucks: The School That Opened A City(WFYI, 2016) Adams, Susan; Bangert, Sara; Bradbury, Kelly; Morton, Crystal; Kandel-Cisco, Brooke; Jackson, Tambra; Murtadha, Khaula; Payne, PatriciaMany challenging social issues (e.g. stereotyping, democracy, racism, cultural difference, integration, segregation, to name only a few) emerge from “Attucks: The School That Opened A City.” Grappling with these issues is central to children’s understanding of society, therefore they are addressed in this elementary, middle, and high school curriculum guide developed in partnership with Butler University, IUPUI and Indianapolis Public Schools.Item Implicit and explicit stigma of mental illness: attitudes in an evidence-based practice(Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer) - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013-12) Stull, Laura G.; McGrew, John H.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Ashburn-Nardo, Leslie; Department of Psychology, School of ScienceThe extent to which explicit and implicit stigma are endorsed by mental health practitioners using evidence-based practices is unknown. The purposes of the current study were to a) examine implicit and explicit biases among Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) staff and b) explore the extent to which biases predicted the use of treatment control mechanisms. Participants were 154 ACT staff from nine states. Overall, the participants exhibited positive explicit and implicit attitudes toward people with mental illness. When modeled using latent factors, greater implicit, but not explicit, bias significantly predicted greater endorsement of restrictive or controlling clinical interventions. Thus, despite overall positive attitudes toward those with mental illness for the sample as a whole, individual differences in provider stigma were related to clinical care. Mental health professionals, and specifically ACT clinicians, should be educated on types of bias and ways in which biases influence clinical interventions.Item Implicit and Explicit Stigma of Mental Illness: Attitudes in an Evidence-Based Practice(2013) Stull, Laura G.; McGrew, John H.; Salyers, Michelle P.; Ashburn-Nardo, LeslieItem Interventions targeting mental health self-stigma: A review and comparison(American Psychological Association, 2015-06) Yanos, Philip T.; Lucksted, Alicia; Drapalski, Amy L.; Roe, David; Lysaker, Paul; Department of Psychiatry, IU School of MedicineOBJECTIVE: With growing awareness of the impact of mental illness self-stigma, interest has arisen in the development of interventions to combat it. The present article briefly reviews and compares interventions targeting self-stigma to clarify the similarities and important differences between the interventions. METHOD: We conducted a narrative review of published literature on interventions targeting self-stigma. RESULTS: Six intervention approaches (Healthy Self-Concept, Self-Stigma Reduction Program, Ending Self-Stigma, Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy, Coming Out Proud, and Anti-Stigma Photo-Voice Intervention) were identified and are discussed, and data is reviewed on format, group-leader backgrounds, languages, number of sessions, primary mechanisms of action, and the current state of data on their efficacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conclude with a discussion of common elements and important distinctions between the interventions and a consideration of which interventions might be best suited to particular populations or settings.