- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Promotion"
Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item "The Crossroads of the Air": Boosterism and the Development of the Indianapolis Municipal Airport, 1925-1939(2015) Crosby, Christine; Monroe, Elizabeth Brand; Barrows, Robert G.; Gantz, Richard A.This work explores the relationship from 1925 to 1939 between the business and government leaders of Indianapolis and the development of a municipal airport for the city. Beginning in 1925, local leaders worked to provide the city with a public airport. The initiation of three distinct and consecutive airport projects during this period closely tied development of a public airport with the commercial future of Indianapolis. The Chamber of Commerce led the first project, which established a public airport shared with the Indiana National Guard. Soon after this airport opened, the City of Indianapolis, with the cooperation of the Chamber of Commerce, undertook the development of a larger municipal airport in Indianapolis that opened in 1931. Finally, in 1938 the city government cooperated with the Civil Aeronautics Authority (CAA) to build a national aviation experimental station at the Indianapolis Municipal Airport.Item The Double Bind of Reproductive Expectations: Exploring the Mechanisms Through Which Voluntarily Childfree Women and Mothers are Penalized in Promotion Decisions(2022-05) Weigold, H. Arispa; Ashburn-Nardo, Leslie; Pietri, Eva; Andel, StephanieAn increasing number of working age adults are choosing to delay or forego parenthood entirely, but little research has explored how voluntarily childfree adults are perceived and treated in the workplace. While a large body of research has examined the impacts of motherhood on working women, little work has been done to understand the experiences of voluntarily childfree women. This study explored perceptions of working women based on their reproductive choices and whether these perceptions relate to differences in promotion decisions. Based on social backlash theory, I hypothesized that voluntarily childfree (VCF) women would be penalized in promotion decisions, and that perceptions of agentic-dominance and communality would explain this relationship. Using a sample of 220 participants recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk, I tested my proposed mediation model and found no support for my hypotheses. Counter to expectations, no evidence of the motherhood penalty emerged either. Despite the lack of significant findings in this study, future work should consider assessing the relationships proposed with different experimental design.Item Making the Invisible Visible: DEI Pathways to Promotion and Tenure(2023-06-13) Sotto-Santiago, Sylk; Gibau, Gina Sanchez; Conwell, Walter; Soto-Greene, MariaPromotion and tenure criteria must reward DEI and health equity work. Doing so credits service largely provided by historically minoritized faculty and faculty committed to public scholarship and community-engagement. In 2021, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis’ faculty senate overwhelmingly approved a new path to promotion centered on DEI, legitimizing DEI as a discipline and in service to communities and the institution. Similar work is underway at Rutgers/New Jersey Medical School and other institutions. Our goal is to present a session that offers key data, but most importantly faculty case-studies as examples of ways that DEI has been integrated by faculty seeking promotion and tenure, as well as examples of faculty submitting dossiers through this DEI-centered pathway. We will also offer examples of DEI-centered criteria and evidence supporting areas of excellence. Lastly, we will discuss the institutional process for proposing, engaging, approving, and implementing this major policy. Participants can expect a rich conversation with examples, as well as materials to either launch conversations at their own institutions or incorporating DEI into their dossiers for promotion and/or tenure.Item New Approaches for Supporting and Encouraging Associate Professors to Pursue the Rank of Full Professor(2016-09-16) McDaniel, Craig; Jacobson, Marc; Roberts, Eva; Stevens, MadisonItem Overcoming barriers to promotion for women and underrepresented inmedicine faculty in academic emergency medicine(Wiley, 2021-12-21) Oh, Laura; Linden, Judith A.; Zeidan, Amy; Salhi, Bisan; Lema, Penelope C.; Pierce, Ava E.; Greene, Andrea L.; Werner, Sandra L.; Heron, Sheryl L.; Lall, Michelle D.; Finnell, John T.; Franks, Nicole; Battaglioli, Nicole J.; Haber, Jordana; Sampson, Christopher; Fisher, Jonathan; Pillow, M. Tyson; Doshi, Ankur A.; Lo, Bruce; Emergency Medicine, School of MedicineEquity in the promotion of women and underrepresented minorities (URiM) is essential for the advancement of academic emergency medicine and the specialty as a whole. Forward‐thinking healthcare organizations can best position themselves to optimally care for an increasingly diverse patient population and mentor trainees by championing increased diversity in senior faculty ranks, leadership, and governance roles. This article explores several potential solutions to addressing inequities that hinder the advancement of women and URiM faculty. It is intended to complement the recently approved American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) policy statement aimed at overcoming barriers to promotion of women and URiM faculty in academic emergency medicine. This policy statement was jointly released and supported by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM), American Academy of Emergency Medicine (AAEM), and the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine (AACEM).Item Promotion and tenure for community-engaged research: An examination of promotion and tenure support for community-engaged research at three universities collaborating through a Clinical and Translational Science Award(http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cts.12061, 2013-06-06) Marrero, David G.; Hardwick, Emily J.; Staten, Lisa K.; Savaiano, Dennis A.; Odell, Jere D.; Frederickson, Karen; Saha, ChandanIntroduction. Community engaged health research, an approach to research which includes the participation of communities, promotes the translation of research to address and improve social determinants of health. As a way to encourage community engaged research, the National Institutes of Health required applicants to the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) to include a community engagement component. Although grant-funding may support an increase in community engaged research, faculty also respond to the rewards and demands of university promotion and tenure standards. This paper measures faculty perception of how three institutions funded by a CTSA support community engaged research in the promotion and tenure process. Methods: At three institutions funded by a CTSA, tenure track and non-tenure track faculty responded to a survey regarding perceptions of how promotion and tenure committees value community engaged research. Results: Faculty view support for community engaged research with some reserve. Only 36% agree that community engaged research is valued in the promotion and tenure process. Discussion: Encouraging community engaged scholarship requires changing the culture and values behind promotion and tenure decisions. Institutions will increase community engaged research and more faculty will adopt its principles, when it is rewarded by promotion and tenure committees.Item Reframing Academic Productivity, Promotion and Tenure As a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic(Magna, 2021-01-01) Sotto-Santiago, Sylk; Dilly, Christen K.; O'Leary, Heather A.; Craven, Hannah J.; Kara, Areeba; Brown, Cynthia; Kressel, Amy B.; Rohr-Kirchgraber, TheresaFaculty members have been impacted in a multitude of ways by the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, faculty seeking promotion and tenure have been impacted by the disruption and inconsistent levels of productivity. In this article, we consider academic productivity in the context of clinical, research, education and service missions within higher education and the academic medicine professoriate. We offer a series of recommendations to faculty members, to institutions, and to professional societies in hopes we can challenge pre-existing deficits in promotion and tenure processes, and academic worth.