- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Hepatitis C"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Association of Individual and Community Factors With Hepatitis C Infections Among Pregnant People and Newborns(American Medical Association, 2021-10-29) Patrick, Stephen W.; Dupont, William D.; McNeer, Elizabeth; McPheeters, Melissa; Cooper, William O.; Aronoff, David M.; Osmundson, Sarah; Stein, Bradley D.; Medicine, School of MedicineImportance: The opioid crisis has increasingly affected pregnant people and infants. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, a known complication of opioid use, grew in parallel with opioid-related complications; however, the literature informing individual and community risks associated with maternal HCV infection is sparse. Objectives: To determine (1) individual and county-level factors associated with HCV among pregnant people and their newborn infants, and (2) how county-level factors influence individual risk among the highest risk individuals. Design setting and participants: This time-series analysis of retrospective, repeated cross-sectional data included pregnant people in all US counties from 2009 to 2019. We constructed mixed-effects logistic regression models to explore the association between HCV infection and individual and county-level covariates. Analyses were conducted between June 2019 and September 2021. Exposures: Individual-level: race and ethnicity, education, marital status, insurance type; county-level: rurality, employment, density of obstetricians. Main outcomes and measures: Hepatitis C virus as indicated on the newborn's birth certificate. Results: Between 2009 and 2019, there were 39 380 122 pregnant people who met inclusion criteria, among whom 138 343 (0.4%) were diagnosed with HCV. People with HCV were more likely to be White (79.9% vs 53.5%), American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) (2.9% vs 0.9%), be without a 4-year degree (93.2% vs 68.6%), and be unmarried (73.7% vs 38.8%). The rate (per 1000 live births) of HCV among pregnant people increased from 1.8 to 5.1. In adjusted analyses, the following factors were associated with higher rates of HCV: individuals identified as White (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 7.37; 95% CI, 7.20-7.55) and AI/AN (aOR, 7.94; 95% CI, 7.58-8.31) compared with Black individuals, those without a 4-year degree (aOR, 3.19; 95% CI, 3.11-3.28), those with Medicaid vs private insurance (aOR, 3.27; 95% CI, 3.21-3.33), and those who were unmarried (aOR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.76-2.84); whereas, rural residence, higher rates of employment, and greater density of obstetricians was associated with lower risk of HCV. Among individuals at the highest risk of HCV, higher levels of county employment, accounting for other factors, were associated with less of a rise in HCV infections over time. Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study, maternal and newborn HCV infections increased substantially between 2009 and 2019, disproportionately among White and AI/AN people without a 4-year degree. County-level factors, including higher levels of employment, were associated with lower individual risks of acquiring the virus.Item Association of State Medicaid Expansion With Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Liver Transplant Wait-listing in the United States(JAMA, 2020-10-08) Nephew, Lauren D.; Mosesso, Kelly; Desai, Archita; Ghabril, Marwan; Orman, Eric S.; Patidar, Kavish R.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar; Noureddin, Mazen; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of MedicineImportance Millions of Americans gained insurance through the state expansion of Medicaid, but several states with large populations of racial/ethnic minorities did not expand their programs. Objective To investigate the implications of Medicaid expansion for liver transplant (LT) wait-listing trends for racial/ethnic minorities. Design, Setting, and Participants A cohort study was performed of adults wait-listed for LT using the United Network of Organ Sharing database between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017. Poisson regression and a controlled, interrupted time series analysis were used to model trends in wait-listing rates by race/ethnicity. The setting was LT centers in the United States. Main Outcomes and Measures (1) Wait-listing rates by race/ethnicity in states that expanded Medicaid (expansion states) compared with those that did not (nonexpansion states) and (2) actual vs predicted rates of LT wait-listing by race/ethnicity after Medicaid expansion. Results There were 75 748 patients (median age, 57.0 [interquartile range, 50.0-62.0] years; 48 566 [64.1%] male) wait-listed for LT during the study period. The cohort was 8.9% Black and 16.4% Hispanic. Black patients and Hispanic patients were statistically significantly more likely to be wait-listed in expansion states than in nonexpansion states (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.54 [95% CI, 1.44-1.64] for Black patients and 1.21 [95% CI, 1.15-1.28] for Hispanic patients). After Medicaid expansion, there was a decrease in the wait-listing rate of Black patients in expansion states (annual percentage change [APC], −4.4%; 95% CI, −8.2% to −0.6%) but not in nonexpansion states (APC, 0.5%; 95% CI, −4.0% to 5.2%). This decrease was not seen when Black patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were excluded from the analysis (APC, 3.1%; 95% CI, −2.4% to 8.9%), suggesting that they may be responsible for this expansion state trend. Hispanic Medicaid patients without HCV were statistically significantly more likely to be wait-listed in the post–Medicaid expansion era than would have been predicted without Medicaid expansion (APC, 13.2%; 95% CI, 4.0%-23.2%). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that LT wait-listing rates have decreased for Black patients with HCV in states that expanded Medicaid. Conversely, wait-listing rates have increased for Hispanic patients without HCV. Black patients and Hispanic patients may have benefited differently from Medicaid expansion.Item Case Report: Candida dubliniensis as a Cause of Chronic Meningitis(Frontiers Media, 2020-12-08) Tahir, Madiha; Peseski, Andrew M.; Jordan, Stephen J.; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Candida dubliniensis is closely related to Candida albicans and rarely isolated in clinical specimens. C. dubliniensis is increasingly recognized as a pathogen in immunocompromised hosts. We present the third known case of Candida dubliniensis meningitis in a young immunocompetent host. Case Presentation: A 27-year-old female with a history of intravenous heroin use and chronic hepatitis C presented with a 10-month history of headaches and progressive bilateral vision loss. On physical examination, visual acuity was 20/20 in her right eye and grade II papilledema was noted. Examination of her left eye revealed complete loss of vision and grade IV papilledema. An MRI with and without contrast revealed increased leptomeningeal enhancement involving the posterior fossa and spinal cord. After multiple lumbar punctures, cerebrospinal fluid fungal cultures grew Candida dubliniensis. The patient was successfully treated with a combination of liposomal amphotericin and fluconazole for 6 weeks with complete resolution of her CNS symptoms, with the exception of irreversible vision loss. Conclusion: We report a case of chronic meningitis due to Candida dubliniensis in an immunocompetent woman with hepatitis C and a history of intravenous heroin use. Additional studies are needed to confirm risk factors for Candida dubliniensis colonization, which likely predisposes individuals to invasive candidiasis.Item Consensus Guidelines: Best Practices for Detection, Assessment and Management of Suspected Acute Drug-Induced Liver Injury During Clinical Trials in Adults with Chronic Viral Hepatitis and Adults with Cirrhosis Secondary to Hepatitis B, C and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis(Springer, 2021) Treem, William R.; Palmer, Melissa; Lonjon‑Domanec, Isabelle; Seekins, Daniel; Dimick‑Santos, Lara; Avigan, Mark I.; Marcinak, John F.; Dash, Ajit; Regev, Arie; Maller, Eric; Patwardhan, Meenal; Lewis, James H.; Rockey, Don C.; Di Bisceglie, Adrian M.; Freston, James W.; Andrade, Raul J.; Chalasani, Naga; Medicine, School of MedicineWith the widespread development of new drugs to treat chronic liver diseases (CLDs), including viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), more patients are entering trials with abnormal baseline liver tests and with advanced liver injury, including cirrhosis. The current regulatory guidelines addressing the monitoring, diagnosis, and management of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during clinical trials primarily address individuals entering with normal baseline liver tests. Using the same laboratory criteria cited as signals of potential DILI in studies involving patients with no underlying liver disease and normal baseline liver tests may result in premature and unnecessary cessation of a study drug in a clinical trial population whose abnormal and fluctuating liver tests are actually due to their underlying CLD. This position paper focuses on defining best practices for the detection, monitoring, diagnosis, and management of suspected acute DILI during clinical trials in patients with CLD, including hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), both with and without cirrhosis and NASH with cirrhosis. This is one of several position papers developed by the IQ DILI Initiative, comprising members from 16 pharmaceutical companies in collaboration with DILI experts from academia and regulatory agencies. It is based on an extensive literature review and discussions between industry members and experts from outside industry to achieve consensus regarding the recommendations. Key conclusions and recommendations include (1) the importance of establishing laboratory criteria that signal potential DILI events and that fit the disease indication being studied in the clinical trial based on knowledge of the natural history of test fluctuations in that disease; (2) establishing a pretreatment value that is based on more than one screening determination, and revising that baseline during the trial if a new nadir is achieved during treatment; (3) basing rules for increased monitoring and for stopping drug for potential DILI on multiples of baseline liver test values and/or a threshold value rather than multiples of the upper limit of normal (ULN) for that test; (4) making use of more sensitive tests of liver function, including direct bilirubin (DB) or combined parameters such as aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase (AST:ALT) ratio or model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) to signal potential DILI, especially in studies of patients with cirrhosis; and (5) being aware of potential confounders related to complications of the disease being studied that may masquerade as DILI events.Item Correction to: Development and Feasibility Testing of a Multilevel Intervention to Increase Hepatitis C Virus Screening Among Baby Boomers in Primary Care(Springer, 2023) Kasting, Monica L.; Laily, Alfu; Nephew, Lauren D.; Shields, Cleveland G.; Shedd‑Steele, Rivienne; Rawl, Susan M.; Medicine, School of MedicineCorrection to: Journal of Cancer Education 10.1007/s13187-023-02268-x The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Table 3, p.8 of the article, the header REMINDER LETTER should be replaced with EDUCATIONAL VIDEO. The original article has been corrected.Item Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis C Patients: Biomarker Discovery by LC-MS(Elsevier, 2014-09-01) Bowers, Jeremiah; Hughes, Emma; Skill, Nicholas; Maluccio, Mary; Raftery, Daniel; Department of Surgery, IU School of MedicineHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for most cases of liver cancer worldwide; contraction of hepatitis C (HCV) is considered a major risk factor for liver cancer even when individuals have not developed formal cirrhosis. Global, untargeted metabolic profiling methods were applied to serum samples from patients with either HCV alone or HCC (with underlying HCV). The main objective of the study was to identify metabolite based biomarkers associated with cancer risk, with the long term goal of ultimately improving early detection and prognosis. Serum global metabolite profiles from patients with HCC (n=37) and HCV (n=21) were obtained using high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) methods. The selection of statistically significant metabolites for partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model creation based on biological and statistical significance was contrasted to that of a traditional approach utilizing p-values alone. A PLS-DA model created using the former approach resulted in a model with 92% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and an AUROC of 0.93. A series of PLS-DA models iteratively utilizing three to seven metabolites that were altered significantly (p<0.05) and sufficiently (FC≤0.7 or FC≥1.3) showed the best performance using p-values alone, the PLS-DA model was capable of generating 73% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and an AUROC of 0.92. Metabolic profiles derived from LC-MS readily distinguish patients with HCC and HCV from those with HCV only. Differences in the metabolic profiles between highrisk individuals and HCC indicate the possibility of identifying the early development of liver cancer in at risk patients. The use of biological significance as a selection process prior to PLSDA modeling may offer improved probabilities for translation of newly discovered biomarkers to clinical application.Item Development and Feasibility Testing of a Multilevel Intervention to Increase Hepatitis C Virus Screening Among Baby Boomers in Primary Care(Springer, 2023) Kasting, Monica L.; Laily, Alfu; Nephew, Lauren D.; Shields, Cleveland G.; Shedd‑Steele, Rivienne; Rawl, Susan M.; Medicine, School of MedicineChronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) results in an increased risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Only 15% of baby boomers (born 1945–1965) have ever been screened. We aimed to develop a multilevel intervention to increase HCV screening for baby boomers in a primary care setting. This study included two phases: intervention development (phase 1) and feasibility testing (phase 2). In phase 1, we partnered with a Community Advisory Board and a Provider Advisory Board to develop a multilevel intervention to increase HCV screening to be delivered to both providers and patients in primary care. Phase 2 assessed intervention feasibility, acceptability, and usability by conducting Concurrent Think Aloud (CTA) interviews and surveys using previously validated scales with patients (n = 8) and providers (n = 7). Phase 1 results: The patient-level intervention included a mailed reminder letter and CDC pamphlet and a 7-min in-clinic educational video. The provider-level intervention included a 30-min educational session and monthly performance feedback e-mails. Phase 2 results: Qualitatively, both the patient and provider-level intervention were feasible, acceptable, and usable by the target audiences. Quantitatively, on a 1–4 scale, the range of patient-level scores was 3.00–4.00 and provider level was 3.50–4.00 for feasibility, acceptability, and usability. This intervention could improve HCV screening among a high-risk population and therefore reduce HCV-related morbidity and mortality. This project developed a feasible, acceptable, and usable multilevel intervention aimed at increasing HCV screening in primary care.Item Donor Utilization in the Recent Era: Effect of Sex, Drugs, and Increased Risk(American Heart Association, 2022) Baran, David A.; Long, Ashleigh; Lansinger, Justin; Copeland, Jack G.; Copeland, Hannah; Surgery, School of MedicineBackground: Heart transplantation volumes have increased in recent years, yet less than a third of donors are typically accepted for transplantation. Whether donor sex, donor drug use, or perception of increased risk affects utilization for transplantation is unclear. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for donors from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. Donor toxicology was collected when available. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine correlations with donor utilization. Results: Between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017, there were 87 816 heart donors aged ≥15 years. The mean age was 42.7±15.8 years, and 24 831 donors (28.3%) were utilized for heart transplantation. Subsequent analyses focused on donors between 15 and 39 years old. The strongest associations with donor acceptance were for male donor sex, blood type, hepatitis C antibody, donor age, left ventricular hypertrophy, and history of donor drug use. After removing hepatitis C, Public Health Service Increased Risk was identified as a strong negative predictor. Most positive drug toxicology results were associated with donor nonuse except for donors between 15 and 19 years of age. Exceptions included alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine. Opiates were associated with less utilization at all donor ages. The Public Health Service Increased Risk status was associated with significantly less utilization in all age groups except 15- to 19-year-old donors. Conclusions: While male donors were preferentially utilized, donors with drug use or those deemed Public Health Service Increased Risk were significantly less utilized for heart transplantation. Further consideration of such donors would be appropriate particularly as the demand for transplantation continues to increase.Item Factors Associated with Screening Baby Boomers for Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Primary Care Providers: a Retrospective Analysis(Springer, 2021) Kasting, Monica L.; Giuliano, Anna R.; Reich, Richard R.; Rathwell, Julie; Roetzheim, Richard G.; Vadaparampil, Susan T.; Medicine, School of MedicineItem Initial uptake, time to treatment, and real-world effectiveness of all-oral direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection in the United States: A retrospective cohort analysis(PLOS, 2019-08-22) Kwo, Paul Y.; Puenpatom, Amy; Zhang, Zuoyi; Hui, Siu L.; Kelley, Andrea A.; Muschi, David; Biostatistics, School of Public HealthBACKGROUND: Data on initiation and utilization of direct-acting antiviral therapies for hepatitis C virus infection in the United States are limited. This study evaluated treatment initiation, time to treatment, and real-world effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapy in individuals with hepatitis C virus infection treated during the first 2 years of availability of all-oral direct-acting antiviral therapies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken using electronic medical records and chart review abstraction of hepatitis C virus-infected individuals aged >18 years diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015 from the Indiana University Health database. RESULTS: Eight hundred thirty people initiated direct-acting antiviral therapy during the 2-year observation window. The estimated incidence of treatment initiation was 8.8%±0.34% at the end of year 1 and 15.0%±0.5% at the end of year 2. Median time to initiating therapy was 300 days. Using a Cox regression analysis, positive predictors of treatment initiation included age (hazard ratio, 1.008), prior hepatitis C virus treatment (1.74), cirrhosis (2.64), and history of liver transplant (1.5). History of drug abuse (0.43), high baseline alanine aminotransferase levels (0.79), hepatitis B virus infection (0.41), and self-pay (0.39) were negatively associated with treatment initiation. In the evaluable population (n = 423), 83.9% (95% confidence interval, 80.1-87.3%) of people achieved sustained virologic response. CONCLUSION: In the early years of the direct-acting antiviral era, <10% of people diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection received direct-acting antiviral treatment; median time to treatment initiation was 300 days. Future analyses should evaluate time to treatment initiation among those with less advanced fibrosis.