- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "FNA"
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Cytology Brushing of a Pancreas Cyst Wall for the Diagnosis of Cystic Neuroendocrine Tumor: When FNA Fails(Elsevier, 2017) El Hajj, Ihab I.; Emerson, Robert E.; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; Department of Medicine, IU School of MedicineItem Fine-Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Microcarcinoma(Elsevier, 2017) Partyka, Kristen L.; Wu, Howard H.; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineIntroduction Widespread use of ultrasound allows for detection of smaller thyroid nodules and preoperative evaluation with fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Both incidental and non-incidental microcarcinoma can be found, leading to uncertainty with clinical management. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis of thyroid FNAs performed at our institution was conducted for the 5-year period from 2010 to 2014. Aspirates were categorized using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Cytologic diagnoses were then correlated with final histopathology. Among samples with malignancy on surgical resection, nodules were stratified by size. Results A total of 2531 thyroid FNAs were identified; 587 samples had histologic correlation, and 259 malignancies were reported. They were separated into nodules >1 cm (n = 144, 56%) and ≤1 cm (n = 115, 44%). Microcarcinoma was further subdivided into incidental (size ≤0.5 cm, n = 55, 48%) and non-incidental (size >0.5 cm and ≤1 cm, n = 60, 52%). The preoperative cytologic diagnoses for incidental microcarcinoma were: benign (B, n = 11, 20%), follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS, n = 15, 27%), follicular neoplasm (FN, n = 11, 20%), suspicious for malignancy (SM, n = 7, 13%), malignant (M, n = 8, 15%), and nondiagnostic (ND, n = 3, 5%). The FNA categories for non-incidental microcarcinoma were: B (n = 13, 22%), FLUS (n = 3, 5%), FN (n = 3, 5%), SM (n = 10, 17%), M (n = 29, 48%), and ND (n = 2, 3%). Conclusions Incidental microcarcinoma is not an uncommon entity, making up 21% (55 of 259) of malignant nodules on thyroidectomy. Indeterminate diagnoses (FLUS + FN + SM) accounted for the majority (60%) of preoperative FNAs for incidental microcarcinoma, compared with 27% for those of non-incidental microcarcinoma (P < 0.05, χ2 test).Item Fluid analysis prior to surgical resection of suspected mucinous pancreatic cysts. A single centre experience(AME Publishing Company, 2011-12) Al-Rashdan, Abdullah; Schmidt, C. Max; Al-Haddad, Mohammad; McHenry, Lee; LeBlanc, Julia Kim; Sherman, Stuart; Dewitt, JohnObjective EUS-FNA cytology and fluid analysis are frequently utilized to evaluate pancreatic cysts. Elevated cyst fluid CEA is usually indicative of a mucinous pancreatic cyst but whether CEA or amylase values can subclassify various mucinous cysts is unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine whether cyst fluid CEA and amylase obtained by EUS-FNA can differentiate between mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Methods Using our prospective hospital EUS and surgical databases, we identified all patients who underwent EUS of a pancreatic cyst prior to surgical resection, in the last 10 years. Cysts were pathologically sub-classified as MCNs or IPMNs; all other cysts were considered non-mucinous. Values of cyst fluid CEA and amylase were correlated to corresponding surgical histopathology and compared between the two groups. Results 134 patients underwent surgery for pancreatic cysts including 82 (63%) that also had preoperative EUS. EUS-FNA was performed in 61/82 (74%) and cyst fluid analysis in 35/61 (57%) including CEA and amylase in 35 and 33 patients, respectively. Histopathology in these 35 cysts demonstrated nonmucinous cysts in 10 and mucinous cysts in 25 including: MCNs (n=9) and IPMNs (n=16). Cyst fluid CEA (p=0.19) and amylase (p=0.64) between all IPMNs and MCNs were similar. Between branched duct IPMNs and MCNs alone, cyst fluid CEA (p=0.34) and amylase (p=0.92) were also similar. Conclusion In this single center study, pancreatic cyst fluid amylase and CEA levels appeared to be of limited value to influence the differential of mucinous pancreatic cysts. Larger studies are recommended to evaluate this role further.Item Histologic and Clinical Follow-up of Thyroid Fine Needle Aspirates in Pediatric Patients(Wiley, 2016-07) Partyka, Kristen; Huang, Eric C.; Cramer, Harvey; Chen, Shaoxiong; Wu, Howard H.; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IU School of MedicineBACKGROUND Although fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has an important role in evaluating thyroid nodules in adults, there is little published information regarding its utility in the pediatric population. METHODS A retrospective analysis of thyroid FNAs for patients who were 18 years old or younger at 2 institutions was conducted. Aspirates were retrospectively categorized with the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. These diagnoses were then correlated with either final histopathology or clinical follow-up. RESULTS A total of 186 thyroid FNA samples from 154 patients (122 females and 32 males), who ranged in age from 9 months to 18 years (median, 16 years; mean, 14 years), were identified. FNA was performed to evaluate 1 to 3 nodules for each patient. Aspirates were classified as follows: nondiagnostic (n = 27), benign (n = 114), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS; n = 21), follicular neoplasm (FN; n = 8), suspicious for malignancy (n = 3), and malignant (n = 13). Sixty-one samples had a histologic correlation, 68 were followed clinically for ≥2 years, and 57 either had no follow-up or were followed for <2 years. For statistical purposes, FNA diagnoses of suspicious and malignant were considered positive, and benign lesions were considered negative. The accuracy was 99%, and the sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 100%, respectively. The risk of malignancy, not including papillary microcarcinoma, was 2% for benign aspirates, 21% for AUS, 57% for FN, and 100% for suspicious or malignant aspirates. CONCLUSIONS This analysis demonstrates that FNA is a sensitive and highly specific modality for evaluating thyroid nodules in pediatric patients. Each diagnostic category can facilitate communication and guide appropriate management.Item Utilization of direct smears of thyroid fine‐needle aspirates for ancillary molecular testing: A comparison of two proprietary testing platforms(Wiley, 2018-04) Partyka, Kristen L.; Randolph, Melissa L.; Lawrence, Karen A.; Cramer, Harvey; Wu, Howard H.; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of MedicineBackground Ancillary molecular testing has been recommended for thyroid fine‐needle aspirates (FNA) with indeterminate cytologic diagnoses. Rosetta Genomics and Interpace Diagnostics have developed assays that can utilize direct smears as the testing substrate. Methods A retrospective study of indeterminate thyroid FNAs with known histologic follow‐up was performed. One Diff‐Quik‐stained smear and one Papanicolaou‐stained smear with similar cellularity (at least 60‐100 lesional cells) from each case were sent to Rosetta and Interpace, respectively, for analysis. The results were directly compared and correlated with the final histopathology. Neither company was aware of the follow‐up histologic findings in these cases. Results A total of 10 thyroid FNAs were identified from our 2015 files. The cytologic diagnoses included follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS, n = 5), follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN, n = 4), and suspicious for malignancy (SM, n = 1). Of the seven cases with benign histology, six smears were classified as benign by the RosettaGX microRNA classifier, and one case was designated as suspicious. Five cases were negative by both ThyGenX oncogene panel and ThyraMIR microRNA classifier. One case was negative by ThyGenX and positive on follow‐up ThyraMIR, and one case was positive for KRAS mutation and positive on ThyraMIR. Both the RosettaGX and ThyGenX/ThyraMIR tests demonstrated positive results for the three histologically malignant cases. Conclusion This study demonstrates that two molecular testing platforms performed equally well using our stained direct smears. Both molecular tests revealed a 100% negative predictive rate. RosettaGX showed a 75% positive predictive value in comparison to 60% for ThyGenX/ThyraMIR.