- Browse by Subject
Browsing by Subject "Benzodioxoles"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Acute Methylenedioxypyrovalerone Toxicity(Springer-Verlag, 2015-06) Froberg, Blake A.; Levine, Michael; Beuhler, Michael C.; Judge, Bryan S.; Moore, Philip W.; Engebretsen, Kristin M.; Mckeown, Nathanael J.; Rosenbaum, Christopher D.; Young, Amy C.; Rusyniak, Daniel E.; ACMT Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC); Department of Pediatrics, IU School of MedicineThe objective of this study was to characterize the acute clinical effects, laboratory findings, complications, and disposition of patients presenting to the hospital after abusing synthetic cathinone. We conducted a retrospective multicenter case series of patients with synthetic cathinone abuse by searching for the terms bath salts, MDPV, methylenedioxypyrovalerone, mephedrone, methcathinone, methylone, methedrone, and cathinone within the "agent" field of a national clinical toxicology database (ToxIC). The medical records of these patients were obtained and abstracted by investigators at each study site. Patients with confirmatory testing that identified a synthetic cathinone in either blood or urine were included in the series. Patients who had either an undetectable synthetic cathinone test or no confirmatory testing were excluded. A data abstraction sheet was used to obtain information on each patient. We entered data into an Excel spreadsheet and calculated descriptive statistics. We identified 23 patients with confirmed synthetic cathinone exposure--all were positive for methylenedioxyprovalerone (MDPV). Eighty-three percent were male and 74 % had recreational intent. The most common reported clinical effects were tachycardia (74 %), agitation (65 %), and sympathomimetic syndrome (65 %). Acidosis was the most common laboratory abnormality (43 %). Seventy-eight percent of patients were treated with benzodiazepines and 30 % were intubated. Ninety-six percent of patients were hospitalized and 87 % were admitted to the ICU. The majority (61 %) of patients was discharged home but 30 % required inpatient psychiatric care. There was one death in our series. The majority of patients presenting to the hospital after abusing MDPV have severe sympathomimetic findings requiring hospitalization. A number of these patients require inpatient psychiatric care after their acute presentation.Item Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Improved Clinical Outcomes in a Patient with N1303K-CFTR Based on In Vitro Experimental Evidence(American Thoracic Society, 2021) Huang, Yunjie; Paul, Grace; Lee, Jesun; Yarlagadda, Sunitha; McCoy, Karen; Naren, Anjaparavanda P.; Pediatrics, School of MedicineItem Impact of the expanded label for elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis with no F508del variant in the USA(European Respiratory Society, 2024-11-14) Cromwell, Elizabeth A.; Ostrenga, Josh S.; Sanders, Don B.; Morgan, Wayne; Castellani, Carlo; Szczesniak, Rhonda; Burgel, Pierre-Regis; Pediatrics, School of MedicineBackground: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), which is approved for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) with a F508del variant, was further approved based on in vitro data in the USA for those carrying at least one of 177 rare CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) variants. Methods: PwCF, aged ≥6 years, carrying no F508del variant but with at least one of these 177 rare variants, were identified within the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) between 2020 and 2022. The evolution of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) percentage predicted and rates of pulmonary exacerbations were analysed over the first year following ETI initiation, using a linear regression with generalised estimating equations and a negative binomial model, respectively. Results: A total of 1791 individuals aged ≥6 years with rare CFTR variants were eligible for ETI, corresponding to 5.2% of CFFPR participants. 815 individuals (45.5%), of which 57.9% were already treated with another CFTR modulator, initiated ETI within the first 2 years following approval. Individuals with more severe respiratory disease were more likely to initiate ETI, whereas those previously treated with another CFTR modulator or those with no private insurance coverage had less ETI initiation. ETI initiation was associated with an increase in mean FEV1 % pred by +3.39 (95% CI 2.14-4.64) and a decrease in the rates of pulmonary exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.79). These effects were greater in individuals naïve of previous CFTR modulators. Conclusions: Extension of the ETI label to rare CFTR variants is associated with meaningful improvements in lung function and a marked reduction in pulmonary exacerbations.Item Long-term safety and efficacy of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 12 years or older who are homozygous or heterozygous for Phe508del CFTR (EXTEND): an open-label extension study(Elsevier, 2021) Flume, Patrick A.; Biner, Reta Fischer; Downey, Damian G.; Brown, Cynthia; Jain, Manu; Fischer, Rainald; De Boeck, Kris; Sawicki, Gregory S.; Chang, Philip; Paz-Diaz, Hildegarde; Rubin, Jaime L.; Yang, Yoojung; Hu, Xingdi; Pasta, David J.; Millar, Stefanie J.; Campbell, Daniel; Wang, Xin; Ahluwalia, Neil; Owen, Caroline A.; Wainwright, Claire E.; VX14-661-110 study group; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Tezacaftor-ivacaftor is an approved cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator shown to be efficacious and generally safe and well tolerated over 8-24 weeks in phase 3 clinical studies in participants aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation (F/F; study 661-106 [EVOLVE]) or heterozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation and a residual function mutation (F/RF; study 661-108 [EXPAND]). Longer-term (>24 weeks) safety and efficacy of tezacaftor-ivacaftor has not been assessed in clinical studies. Here, we present results of study 661-110 (EXTEND), a 96-week open-label extension study that assessed long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in participants aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis who were homozygous or heterozygous for the Phe508del CFTR mutation. Methods: Study 661-110 was a 96-week, phase 3, multicentre, open-label study at 170 clinical research sites in Australia, Europe, Israel, and North America. Participants were aged 12 years or older, had cystic fibrosis, were homozygous or heterozygous for Phe508del CFTR, and completed one of six parent studies of tezacaftor-ivacaftor: studies 661-103, 661-106, 661-107, 661-108, 661-109, and 661-111. Participants received oral tezacaftor 100 mg once daily and oral ivacaftor 150 mg once every 12 h for up to 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints were changes in lung function, nutritional parameters, and respiratory symptom scores; pulmonary exacerbations; and pharmacokinetic parameters. A post-hoc analysis assessed the rate of lung function decline in F/F participants who received up to 120 weeks of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in studies 661-106 (F/F) and/or 661-110 compared with a matched cohort of CFTR modulator-untreated historical F/F controls from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Primary safety analyses were done in all participants from all six parent studies who received at least one dose of study drug during this study. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02565914). Findings: Between Aug 31, 2015, to May 31, 2019, 1044 participants were enrolled in study 661-110 from the six parent studies of whom 1042 participants received at least one dose of study drug and were included in the safety set. 995 (95%) participants had at least one TEAE; 22 (2%) had TEAEs leading to discontinuation; and 351 (34%) had serious TEAEs. No deaths occurred during the treatment-emergent period; after the treatment-emergent period, two deaths occurred, which were both deemed unrelated to study drug. F/F (106/110; n=459) and F/RF (108/110; n=226) participants beginning tezacaftor-ivacaftor in study 661-110 had improvements in efficacy endpoints consistent with parent studies; improvements in lung function and nutritional parameters and reductions in pulmonary exacerbations observed in the tezacaftor-ivacaftor groups in the parent studies were generally maintained in study 661-110 for an additional 96 weeks. Pharmacokinetic parameters were also similar to those in the parent studies. The annualised rate of lung function decline was 61·5% (95% CI 35·8 to 86·1) lower in tezacaftor-ivacaftor-treated F/F participants versus untreated matched historical controls. Interpretation: Tezacaftor-ivacaftor was generally safe, well tolerated, and efficacious for up to 120 weeks, and the safety profile of tezacaftor-ivacaftor in study 661-110 was consistent with cystic fibrosis manifestations and with the safety profiles of the parent studies. The rate of lung function decline was significantly reduced in F/F participants, consistent with cystic fibrosis disease modification. Our results support the clinical benefit of long-term tezacaftor-ivacaftor treatment for people aged 12 years or older with cystic fibrosis with F/F or F/RF genotypes.