Alexia Torke

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1805/6821

Assessing Surrogate Decision Making For Older Adults

Hospitalized older adults are often unable to make their own medical decisions due to dementia, delirium or other conditions that impair cognitive function. In such cases, physicians must work with surrogates, usually close family members, to make choices for the patient. Although there is evidence of unwanted medical treatment for seriously ill patients and strain on surrogate decision makers, there has been little study of the frequency, characteristics or outcomes of surrogate decision making for older, hospitalized adults. An observational study conducted by Dr. Torke will characterize the frequency and outcomes of decisions made by surrogates with emphasis on the surrogate's own perspective on decision making. Results from the study will serve as the basis for an intervention to improve the quality and outcomes of surrogate decision making for older, hospitalized adults and their families.

Browse

Browsing Alexia Torke by Subject "advance care planning"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Addressing Personal Barriers to Advance Care Planning: Qualitative Investigation of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Adults with Cancer and Their Family Caregivers
    (Cambridge, 2018) Cottingham, Ann H.; Beck-Coon, Kathleen; Bernat, Jannifer K.; Helft, Paul R.; Schmidt, Karen; Shields, Cleveland G.; Torke, Alexia M.; Johns, Shelley A.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Objective Advance care planning (ACP) increases quality of life and satisfaction with care for those with cancer and their families, yet these important conversations often do not occur. Barriers include patients’ and families’ emotional responses to cancer, such as anxiety and sadness, which can lead to avoidance of discussing illness-related topics such as ACP. Interventions that address psychological barriers to ACP are needed. The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of a mindfulness intervention designed to cultivate patient and caregiver emotional and relational capacity to respond to the challenges of cancer with greater ease, potentially decreasing psychological barriers to ACP and enhancing ACP engagement. Method The Mindfully Optimizing Delivery of End-of-Life (MODEL) Care intervention provided 12 hours of experiential training to two cohorts of six to seven adults with advanced-stage cancer and their family caregivers (n = 13 dyads). Training included mindfulness practices, mindful communication skills development, and information about ACP. Patient and caregiver experiences of the MODEL Care program were assessed using semistructured interviews administered immediately postintervention and open-ended survey questions delivered immediately and at 4 weeks postintervention. Responses were analyzed using qualitative methods. Result Four salient themes were identified. Patients and caregivers reported the intervention (1) enhanced adaptive coping practices, (2) lowered emotional reactivity, (3) strengthened relationships, and (4) improved communication, including communication about their disease. Significance of results The MODEL Care intervention enhanced patient and caregiver capacity to respond to the emotional challenges that often accompany advanced cancer and decreased patient and caregiver psychological barriers to ACP.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Development of a Protocol for Successful Palliative Care Consultation in Population of Patients Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support
    (Elsevier, 2017) Sinha, Shilpee; Belcher, Carey; Torke, Alexia; Howard, Joycelyn; Caccamo, Marco; Slaven, James A.; Gradus-Pizlo, Irmina; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background In 2014, Joint Commission recommended palliative care (PC) engagement in ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation as destination therapy. Limited information is available on established PC protocols in the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) population. Measures The goals of our PC consultation were to document advance care planning (ACP) discussions and designate a surrogate decision maker (SDM) prior to MCS implantation. A retrospective analysis compared the frequency of PC consults, ACP discussion, and SDM before and after protocol implementation. Intervention A protocol was developed to conduct interdisciplinary PC consultations for the MCS population. Outcomes The percentage of PC consults placed prior to MCS implantation increased from 11 (17.2%) pre-protocol to 56 (96.6%) post-protocol (p<0.0001), and documented SDM increased from 26 (40.6%) pre-protocol to 57 (98.3%) post protocol (p<0.0001). Conclusion Close PC/cardiology collaboration can substantially improve ACP discussions and SDM documentation in the MCS population. This multidisciplinary protocol facilitates successful PC consultations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Mindfulness Training Supports Quality of Life and Advance Care Planning in Adults With Metastatic Cancer and Their Caregivers: Results of a Pilot Study
    (Sage, 2020-02) Johns, Shelley A.; Beck-Coon, Kathleen; Stutz, Patrick V.; Talib, Tasneem L.; Chinh, Kelly; Cottingham, Ann H.; Schmidt, Karen; Shields, Cleveland; Stout, Madison E.; Stump, Timothy E.; Monahan, Patrick O.; Torke, Alexia M.; Helft, Paul R.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background: Emotional distress often causes patients with cancer and their family caregivers (FCGs) to avoid end-of-life discussions and advance care planning (ACP), which may undermine quality of life (QoL). Most ACP interventions fail to address emotional barriers that impede timely ACP. Aim: We assessed feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a mindfulness-based intervention to facilitate ACP for adults with advanced-stage cancer and their FCGs. Design: A single-arm pilot was conducted to assess the impact of a 6-week group mindfulness intervention on ACP behaviors (patients only), QoL, family communication, avoidant coping, distress, and other outcomes from baseline (T1) to post-intervention (T2) and 1 month later (T3). Participants: Eligible patients had advanced-stage solid malignancies, limited ACP engagement, and an FCG willing to participate. Thirteen dyads (N = 26 participants) enrolled at an academic cancer center in the United States. Results: Of eligible patients, 59.1% enrolled. Attendance (70.8% across 6 sessions) and retention (84.6% for patients; 92.3% for FCGs) through T3 were acceptable. Over 90% of completers reported high intervention satisfaction. From T1 to T3, patient engagement more than doubled in each of 3 ACP behaviors assessed. Patients reported large significant decreases in distress at T2 and T3. Family caregivers reported large significant improvements in QoL and family communication at T2 and T3. Both patients and FCGs reported notable reductions in sleep disturbance and avoidant coping at T3. Conclusions: The mindfulness intervention was feasible and acceptable and supported improvements in ACP and associated outcomes for patients and FCGs. A randomized trial of mindfulness training for ACP is warranted.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Tool to Assess Patient and Surrogate Knowledge about the POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) Program
    (Elsevier, 2019) Hickman, Susan E.; Torke, Alexia M.; Sachs, Greg A.; Sudore, Rebecca L.; Myers, Anne L.; Tang, Qing; Bakoyannis, Giorgos; Hammes, Bernard J.; School of Nursing
    Context It is especially important that patients are well-informed when making high stakes, preference-sensitive decisions like those on the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form. However, there is currently no way to easily evaluate whether patients understand key concepts when making these important decisions. Objectives To develop a POLST knowledge survey. Methods Expert (n = 62) ratings of key POLST facts were used to select items for a POLST Knowledge Survey. The survey was administered to nursing facility residents (n = 97) and surrogate decision-makers (n = 112). A subset (n = 135) were re-administered the survey after a standardized advance care planning discussion to assess responsiveness of the scale to change. Results The 19-item survey demonstrated adequate reliability (α = 0.72.). Residents’ scores (x = 11.4, standard deviation 3.3) were significantly lower than surrogate scores (x = 14.7, standard deviation 2.5) (p < .001). Scores for both groups increased significantly following administration of a standardized advance care planning discussion (p < .001). Although being a surrogate, age, race, education, cognitive functioning, and health literacy were significantly associated with higher POLST Knowledge Survey scores in univariate analyses, only being a surrogate (p < 0.001) and being white (p = 0.028) remained significantly associated with higher scores in multivariate analyses. Conclusion The 19-item POLST Knowledge Survey demonstrated adequate reliability and responsiveness to change. Findings suggest the survey could be used to identify knowledge deficits and provide targeted education to ensure adequate understanding of key clinical decisions when completing POLST.