Center for Service and Learning
Permanent URI for this community
The Center for Service and Learning engages students, faculty, staff, and community members in educationally meaningful service to promote learning and development; advances best practices and research; achieves community goals through partnerships; and furthers the civic engagement mission of IUPUI.
Browse
Browsing Center for Service and Learning by Subject "assessment"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Democratically engaged assessment: Reimagining the purposes and practices of assessment in community engagement(2018) Bandy, J.; Price, Mary F.; Clayton, P. H.; Metzker, J.; Nigro, G.; Stanlick, S.; Etheridge Woodson, S.; Bartel, A.; Gale, S.This document is a project of reclamation and transformation, one that is both ongoing and rooted in years of dialogue within Imagining America and the work of its Assessing Practices of Public Scholarship research group (APPS). It emerges from our own experiences with assessment related to community engagement and from those of many other colleagues on campuses and in diverse communities. It is intended to bring together those who wish to reimagine assessment in light of its civic potential — to develop what we refer to as Democratically Engaged Assessment (DEA).Item The Transformational Relationship Evaluation Scale II (TRES II) Reflection Framework: Version 2(2022-04) Clayton, Patti H.; Camo-Biogradlija, Jasmina; Kniffin, Lori E.; Price, Mary F.; Bringle, Robert G.; Pier, Alyssa A.The Transformational Relationship Evaluation Scale Reflection Framework (TRES II Reflection Framework, Version 2) is a critical reflection tool designed for all participants in community-campus relationships to generate actionable learning regarding their collective work and to serve as an intervention to deepen those relationships. This tool was designed to accompany the Transformational Relationship Evaluation Scale II (TRES II), which on its own has documented utility to enhance partnership inquiry and practice (Kniffin et. al., 2020). The TRES II Reflection Framework broadens and deepens the scale with intentionally-designed prompts structured using the DEAL Model of Critical Reflection (Ash & Clayton, 2009). Authors’ Note: This version of the TRES II Reflection Framework was last updated in April, 2022, and a PDF file can be accessed at the link provided in the recommended reference. Contact Patti Clayton, patti.clayton@curricularengagement.com, for an editable Word file and/or future versions.Item Transforming Assessment Practice Through the Lens of Democratic Engagement - handouts(2018) Price, Mary F.; Bandy, J.; Clayton, P.H.; Gale, S.; Metzker, J.Is your assessment practice value-laden, value-free or value-neutral? What role do your own value commitments play when you design learning assessments or program evaluation metrics? What impact do values have on outcomes? This session introduces an emerging framework, Democratically Engaged Assessment (DEA) that attends to these questions. DEA reimagines assessment as a cultural practice through which we can transform our universities, our communities, and ourselves. Participants will use the model to surface values inherent in our assessments and explore implications of using the framework to inform how we assess and what becomes the focus of assessment with students, faculty, staff, community partners, and institutions.Item Transforming Assessment Practice Through the Lens of Democratic Engagement - PPT(2018) Price, Mary F.; Bandy, J.; Clayton, P. H.; Gale, S.; Metzker, J.Is your assessment practice value-laden, value-free or value-neutral? What role do your own value commitments play when you design learning assessments or program evaluation metrics? What impact do values have on outcomes? This session introduces an emerging framework, Democratically Engaged Assessment (DEA) that attends to these questions. DEA reimagines assessment as a cultural practice through which we can transform our universities, our communities, and ourselves. Participants will use the model to surface values inherent in our assessments and explore implications of using the framework to inform how we assess and what becomes the focus of assessment with students, faculty, staff, community partners, and institutions.