Mary F. Price: Selected Works
Permanent URI for this community
Browse
Browsing Mary F. Price: Selected Works by browse.metadata.dateaccessioned
Now showing 1 - 10 of 17
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Using Visual Reflection Tools to Build Capacity for Partnership Improvement(Center for Service and Learning, 6/1/2012) Officer, Starla D.; Price, Mary F.Item Partnerships in Service Learning and Civic Engagement(2009) Bringle, Robert G.; Clayton, Patti H.; Price, Mary F.Developing campus-community partnerships is a core element of well-designed and effective civic engagement, including service learning and participatory action research. A structural model, SOFAR, is presented that differentiates campus into administrators, faculty, and students, and that differentiates community into organizational staff and residents (or clients, consumers, advocates). Partnerships are presented as being a subset of relationships between persons. The quality of these dyadic relationships is analyzed in terms of the degree to which the interactions possess closeness, equity, and integrity, and the degree to which the outcomes of those interactions are exploitive, transactional, or transformational. Implications are then offered for how this analysis can improve practice and research.Item Public Scholarship at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis(2016-06) Wood, Elizabeth; Hong, Youngbok; Price, Mary F.; Stanton-Nichols, Kathleen; Hatcher, Julie A.; Craig, David M.; Kelly, Jason M.; Silverman, Ross D.; Palmer, Kristi L.Community engagement is a defining attribute of the campus, and the current Strategic Plan identifies a number of strategic actions to “Deepen our Commitment to Community Engagement.” In May 2015, A Faculty Learning Community (FLC) on Public Scholarship was established in May, 2015 to address the campus strategic goals to “recognize and reward contributions to community engagement” and “define community engagement work…in Faculty Annual Reports and promotion and tenure guidelines.” At IUPUI, scholarly work occurs in research and creative activity, teaching, and/or service. In terms of promotion and tenure, faculty members must declare an area of excellence in one of these three domains. The FLC on Public Scholarship is a 3-year initiative co-sponsored by Academic Affairs and the Center for Service and Learning (CSL). Seven faculty members from across campus were selected to be part of the 2015-2016 FLC, and two co-chairs worked closely with CSL staff to plan and facilitate the ongoing work. The FLC is charged with defining public scholarship, identifying criteria to evaluate this type of scholarship, assist faculty in documenting their community-engaged work, and working with department Chairs and Deans in adapting criteria into promotion and tenure materials. The intended audiences for this work includes faculty, community-engaged scholars, public scholars, promotion and tenure committees, external reviewers, and department Chairs and Deans. The following provides background to the campus context and a brief summary of work to date, including definition and proposed criteria to evaluate public scholarship.Item IUPUI Taxonomy for Service Learning Courses(2016-08-16) Hahn, Thomas; Hatcher, Julie; Price, Mary F.; Studer, MorganThe Center for Service and Learning at Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis has developed a Taxonomy of service learning courses that supports fidelity and quality by identifying six crucial attributes of service learning courses (i.e., diversity of interactions, civic competencies, community activities, critical reflection, reciprocal partnerships, and assessment).Item Talking Points on Publicly Engaged Scholarship at IUPUI(2018-02-02) Wood, E.; Price, Mary F.; Hatcher, Julie A.; Stanton-Nichols, K.; Haberski, R.; Palmer, Kristi L.; Goodlett, Charles; Hong, Young-bok; Silverman, Ross D.Talking Points on Publicly Engaged Scholarship at IUPUI Informed by Public Scholarship at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, a concept paper written by the Faculty Learning Community (FLC) on Public Scholarship and refined through ongoing FLC work between 2015-18 in collaboration with faculty across the campus and with nationally-recognized scholars.Item Supporting University-wide Institutional Change in Global Health Volunteerism: A Case in Progress(2018-04-16) Price, Mary F.; Leslie, Stephanie; Mulholland, James; Christy, Lisa; Custer, Jennifer; Brann, Maria; Besing, Kari L.Item Guiding principles for global health volunteer and academic service-learning experience at IUPUI(2018-04-16) Price, Mary F.; Leslie, Stephanie; Mulholland, James; Christy, Lisa; Custer, Jennifer; Brann, Maria; Besing, Kari L.Item Ethical Engagement Vignettes(2018-04-16) Price, Mary F.; Leslie, Stephanie; Mulholland, James; Christy, Lisa; Custer, Jennifer; Brann, Maria; Besing, Kari L.Item Democratically engaged assessment: Reimagining the purposes and practices of assessment in community engagement(2018) Bandy, J.; Price, Mary F.; Clayton, P. H.; Metzker, J.; Nigro, G.; Stanlick, S.; Etheridge Woodson, S.; Bartel, A.; Gale, S.This document is a project of reclamation and transformation, one that is both ongoing and rooted in years of dialogue within Imagining America and the work of its Assessing Practices of Public Scholarship research group (APPS). It emerges from our own experiences with assessment related to community engagement and from those of many other colleagues on campuses and in diverse communities. It is intended to bring together those who wish to reimagine assessment in light of its civic potential — to develop what we refer to as Democratically Engaged Assessment (DEA).Item Transforming Assessment Practice Through the Lens of Democratic Engagement - handouts(2018) Price, Mary F.; Bandy, J.; Clayton, P.H.; Gale, S.; Metzker, J.Is your assessment practice value-laden, value-free or value-neutral? What role do your own value commitments play when you design learning assessments or program evaluation metrics? What impact do values have on outcomes? This session introduces an emerging framework, Democratically Engaged Assessment (DEA) that attends to these questions. DEA reimagines assessment as a cultural practice through which we can transform our universities, our communities, and ourselves. Participants will use the model to surface values inherent in our assessments and explore implications of using the framework to inform how we assess and what becomes the focus of assessment with students, faculty, staff, community partners, and institutions.