Browsing by Author "Van Dyk, Kathleen"
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Associating persistent self-reported cognitive decline with neurocognitive decline in older breast cancer survivors using machine learning: The Thinking and Living with Cancer study(Elsevier, 2022-11) Van Dyk, Kathleen; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhou, Xingtao; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim A.; Bethea, Traci N.; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Dilawari, Asma A.; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly E.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Small, Brent J.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Root, James C.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineIntroduction: Many cancer survivors report cognitive problems following diagnosis and treatment. However, the clinical significance of patient-reported cognitive symptoms early in survivorship can be unclear. We used a machine learning approach to determine the association of persistent self-reported cognitive symptoms two years after diagnosis and neurocognitive test performance in a prospective cohort of older breast cancer survivors. Materials and Methods: We enrolled breast cancer survivors with non-metastatic disease (n=435) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (n=441) between August 2010 and December 2017 and followed until January 2020; we excluded women with neurological disease and all women passed a cognitive screen at enrollment. Women completed the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale and neurocognitive tests of attention, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory and visuospatial ability, and timed activities of daily living assessments at enrollment (pre-systemic treatment) and annually to 24 months, for a total of 59 individual neurocognitive measures. We defined persistent self-reported cognitive decline as clinically meaningful decline (3.7+ points) on the PCI scale from enrollment to twelve months with persistence to 24 months. Analysis used four machine learning models based on data for change scores (baseline to twelve months) on the 59 neurocognitive measures and measures of depression, anxiety, and fatigue to determine a set of variables that distinguished the 24-month persistent cognitive decline group from non-cancer controls or from survivors without decline. Results: The sample of survivors and controls ranged in age from were ages 60–89. Thirty-three percent of survivors had self-reported cognitive decline at twelve months and two-thirds continued to have persistent decline to 24 months (n=60). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models distinguished survivors with persistent self-reported declines from controls (AUC=0.736) and survivors without decline (n=147; AUC=0.744). The variables that separated groups were predominantly neurocognitive test performance change scores, including declines in list learning, verbal fluency, and attention measures. Discussion: Machine learning may be useful to further our understanding of cancer-related cognitive decline. Our results suggest that persistent self-reported cognitive problems among older women with breast cancer are associated with a constellation of mild neurocognitive changes warranting clinical attention.Item Associating Persistent Self-Reported Cognitive Decline with Neurocognitive Decline in Older Breast Cancer Survivors Using Machine Learning: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study(Elsevier, 2022) Van Dyk, Kathleen; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhou, Xingtao; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim A.; Bethea, Traci N.; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Dilawari, Asma A.; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly E.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Small, Brent J.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Root, James C.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineIntroduction: Many cancer survivors report cognitive problems following diagnosis and treatment. However, the clinical significance of patient-reported cognitive symptoms early in survivorship can be unclear. We used a machine learning approach to determine the association of persistent self-reported cognitive symptoms two years after diagnosis and neurocognitive test performance in a prospective cohort of older breast cancer survivors. Materials and methods: We enrolled breast cancer survivors with non-metastatic disease (n = 435) and age- and education-matched non-cancer controls (n = 441) between August 2010 and December 2017 and followed until January 2020; we excluded women with neurological disease and all women passed a cognitive screen at enrollment. Women completed the FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI) scale and neurocognitive tests of attention, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory and visuospatial ability, and timed activities of daily living assessments at enrollment (pre-systemic treatment) and annually to 24 months, for a total of 59 individual neurocognitive measures. We defined persistent self-reported cognitive decline as clinically meaningful decline (3.7+ points) on the PCI scale from enrollment to twelve months with persistence to 24 months. Analysis used four machine learning models based on data for change scores (baseline to twelve months) on the 59 neurocognitive measures and measures of depression, anxiety, and fatigue to determine a set of variables that distinguished the 24-month persistent cognitive decline group from non-cancer controls or from survivors without decline. Results: The sample of survivors and controls ranged in age from were ages 60-89. Thirty-three percent of survivors had self-reported cognitive decline at twelve months and two-thirds continued to have persistent decline to 24 months (n = 60). Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) models distinguished survivors with persistent self-reported declines from controls (AUC = 0.736) and survivors without decline (n = 147; AUC = 0.744). The variables that separated groups were predominantly neurocognitive test performance change scores, including declines in list learning, verbal fluency, and attention measures. Discussion: Machine learning may be useful to further our understanding of cancer-related cognitive decline. Our results suggest that persistent self-reported cognitive problems among older women with breast cancer are associated with a constellation of mild neurocognitive changes warranting clinical attention.Item Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study(Springer, 2022) Root, James C.; Zhou, Xingtao; Ahn, Jaeil; Small, Brent J.; Zhai, Wanting; Bethea, Traci; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Dilawari, Asma; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Isaacs, Claudine; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly; Saykin, Andrew J.; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Ahles, Tim A.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicinePurpose: Tumor features associated with aggressive cancers may affect cognition prior to systemic therapy. We evaluated associations of cognition prior to adjuvant therapy and tumor aggressivity in older breast cancer patients. Methods: Women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 705) ages 60-98 were enrolled from August 2010-March 2020. Cognition was measured post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy using self-reported (FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment [PCI]) and objective tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE domain) and learning and memory [LM domain]. Linear regression tested associations of pre-treatment tumor features and cognition, adjusting for age, race, and study site. HER2 positivity and higher stage (II/III vs. 0/I) were a priori predictors of cognition; in secondary analyses we explored associations of other tumor features and cognitive impairment (i.e., PCI score < 54 or having 2 tests < 1.5 SD or 1 test < 2 SD from the mean APE or LM domain score). Results: HER2 positivity and the hormone receptor negative/HER2 + molecular subtype were associated with lower adjusted mean self-reported cognition scores and higher impairment rates (p values < .05). Higher stage of disease was associated with lower objective performance in APE. Other tumor features were associated with cognition in unadjusted and adjusted models, including larger tumor size and lower PCI scores (p = 0.02). Tumor features were not related to LM. Conclusions: Pre-adjuvant therapy cognition was associated with HER2 positivity and higher stage of disease and other features of aggressive tumors. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and assess potential mechanisms and clinical management strategies.Item Elevated C-Reactive Protein and Subsequent Patient-Reported Cognitive Problems in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study(American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023) Carroll, Judith E.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Small, Brent J.; Zhou, Xingtao; Cohen, Harvey J.; Ahles, Tim A.; Ahn, Jaeil; Bethea, Traci N.; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Isaacs, Claudine; Jim, Heather S. L.; Jacobsen, Paul B.; McDonald, Brenna C.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly; Root, James; Saykin, Andrew J.; Tometich, Danielle B.; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhai, Wanting; Breen, Elizabeth C.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicinePurpose: To examine longitudinal relationships between levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and cognition in older breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls. Methods: English-speaking women age ≥ 60 years, newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer (stage 0-III), and frequency-matched controls were enrolled from September 2010 to March 2020; women with dementia, neurologic disorders, and other cancers were excluded. Assessments occurred presystemic therapy/enrollment and at annual visits up to 60 months. Cognition was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function and neuropsychological testing. Mixed linear effect models tested for survivor-control differences in natural log (ln)-transformed CRP at each visit. Random effect-lagged fluctuation models tested directional effects of ln-CRP on subsequent cognition. All models controlled for age, race, study site, cognitive reserve, obesity, and comorbidities; secondary analyses evaluated if depression or anxiety affected results. Results: There were 400 survivors and 329 controls with CRP specimens and follow-up data (average age of 67.7 years; range, 60-90 years). The majority of survivors had stage I (60.9%), estrogen receptor-positive (87.6%) tumors. Survivors had significantly higher adjusted mean ln-CRP than controls at baseline and 12-, 24-, and 60-month visits (all P < .05). Higher adjusted ln-CRP predicted lower participant-reported cognition on subsequent visits among survivors, but not controls (P interaction = .008); effects were unchanged by depression or anxiety. Overall, survivors had adjusted Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function scores that were 9.5 and 14.2 points lower than controls at CRP levels of 3.0 and 10.0 mg/L. Survivors had poorer neuropsychological test performance (v controls), with significant interactions with CRP only for the Trails B test. Conclusion: Longitudinal relationships between CRP and cognition in older breast cancer survivors suggest that chronic inflammation may play a role in development of cognitive problems. CRP testing could be clinically useful in survivorship care.Item Epigenetic Aging in Older Breast Cancer Survivors and Non-Cancer Controls: Preliminary Findings from the Thinking and Living with Cancer (TLC) Study(Wiley, 2023) Rentscher, Kelly E.; Bethea, Traci N.; Zhai, Wanting; Small, Brent J.; Zhou, Xingtao; Ahles, Tim A.; Ahn, Jaeil; Breen, Elizabeth C.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena M. A.; Jim, Heather S. L.; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nakamura, Zev M.; Patel, Sunita K.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Carroll, Judith E.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineBackground: Cancer and its treatments may accelerate aging in survivors; however, research has not examined epigenetic markers of aging in longer term breast cancer survivors. This study examined whether older breast cancer survivors showed greater epigenetic aging than noncancer controls and whether epigenetic aging related to functional outcomes. Methods: Nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 89) enrolled prior to systemic therapy and frequency-matched controls (n = 101) ages 62 to 84 years provided two blood samples to derive epigenetic aging measures (Horvath, Extrinsic Epigenetic Age [EEA], PhenoAge, GrimAge, Dunedin Pace of Aging) and completed cognitive (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function) and physical (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12) function assessments at approximately 24 to 36 and 60 months after enrollment. Mixed-effects models tested survivor-control differences in epigenetic aging, adjusting for age and comorbidities; models for functional outcomes also adjusted for racial group, site, and cognitive reserve. Results: Survivors were 1.04 to 2.22 years biologically older than controls on Horvath, EEA, GrimAge, and DunedinPACE measures (p = .001-.04) at approximately 24 to 36 months after enrollment. Survivors exposed to chemotherapy were 1.97 to 2.71 years older (p = .001-.04), and among this group, an older EEA related to worse self-reported cognition (p = .047) relative to controls. An older epigenetic age related to worse physical function in all women (p < .001-.01). Survivors and controls showed similar epigenetic aging over time, but Black survivors showed accelerated aging over time relative to non-Hispanic White survivors. Conclusion: Older breast cancer survivors, particularly those exposed to chemotherapy, showed greater epigenetic aging than controls that may relate to worse outcomes. If replicated, measurement of biological aging could complement geriatric assessments to guide cancer care for older women.Item Impact of taxane-based chemotherapy among older women with breast cancer on cognition and quality of life: a longitudinal pooled analysis(Springer, 2022) Small, Brent J.; Lange, Marie; Zhai, Wanting; Ahn, Jaeil; Ahles, Tim A.; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey J.; Graham, Deena; Extermann, Martine; Heutte, Natacha; Jim, Heather S. L.; McDonald, Brenna C.; Patel, Sunita K.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhou, Xingtao; Mandelblatt, Jeanne; Joly, Florence; Thinking Living with Cancer C. O. G.-Age Studies; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicinePurpose: Older cancer patients are susceptible to long-term effects of chemotherapy, including cancer-related cognitive decline and impairments to quality of life. Taxane-based chemotherapies are associated with physical declines among older women and may negatively impact cognitive performance. We sought to examine whether changes in objective and subjective measures of cognitive performance and well-being differ among older breast cancer survivors as a function of taxane-based chemotherapy treatment regimens. Methods: Individual-level data were pooled and harmonized from two large prospective studies of older (greater than 60 years) breast cancer survivors. Assessments were conducted prior to systemic therapy and up to 36 months after. Cognitive performance was assessed with objective (working memory, processing speed, and executive functions) and subjective tests and physical, emotional, and functional well-being were also assessed. Results: One hundred and sixty-seven (M age = 67.3 years) women with 116 receiving chemotherapy with taxanes and 51 without taxanes contributed data. Declines in subjective cognition for both groups were significant between pre-treatment and 12-month follow-up. Significant improvements were seen on a measure of objective cognition (working memory) from 12 to 36 months. Measures of well-being improved from prior to systemic therapy to 12 months. Longitudinal changes across all measures did not vary as a function of receipt of taxane-based treatment. Conclusion: Older women who received treatment with taxanes did not have greater declines in cognitive performance or well-being than women receiving other chemotherapy regimens. Despite older cancer survivors being at greater risk for negative outcomes, treatment with taxane-based chemotherapies does not appear to exacerbate these health consequences.Item Plasma levels of interleukin-6 mediate neurocognitive performance in older breast cancer survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer study(Wiley, 2023) Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Small, Brent J.; Zhou, Xingtao; Nakamura, Zev M.; Cohen, Harvey J.; Ahles, Tim A.; Ahn, Jaeil; Bethea, Traci N.; Extermann, Martine; Graham, Deena; Isaacs, Claudine; Jim, Heather S. L.; Jacobsen, Paul B.; McDonald, Brenna C.; Patel, Sunita K.; Rentscher, Kelly E.; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Tometich, Danielle B.; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhai, Wanting; Breen, Elizabeth C.; Carroll, Judith E.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineBackground: Immune activation/inflammation markers (immune markers) were tested to explain differences in neurocognition among older breast cancer survivors versus noncancer controls. Methods: Women >60 years old with primary breast cancer (stages 0-III) (n = 400) were assessed before systemic therapy with frequency-matched controls (n = 329) and followed annually to 60 months; blood was collected during annual assessments from 2016 to 2020. Neurocognition was measured by tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE). Plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), and interferon γ were determined using multiplex testing. Mixed linear models were used to compare results of immune marker levels by survivor/control group by time and by controlling for age, racial/ethnic group, cognitive reserve, and study site. Covariate-adjusted multilevel mediation analyses tested whether survivor/control group effects on cognition were explained by immune markers; secondary analyses examined the impact of additional covariates (e.g., comorbidity and obesity) on mediation effects. Results: Participants were aged 60-90 years (mean, 67.7 years). Most survivors had stage I (60.9%) estrogen receptor-positive tumors (87.6%). Survivors had significantly higher IL-6 levels than controls before systemic therapy and at 12, 24, and 60 months (p ≤ .001-.014) but there were no differences for other markers. Survivors had lower adjusted APE scores than controls (p < .05). Levels of IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α were related to APE, with IL-6 explaining part of the relationship between survivor/control group and APE (p = .01). The magnitude of this mediation effect decreased but remained significant (p = .047) after the consideration of additional covariates. Conclusions: Older breast cancer survivors had worse long-term neurocognitive performance than controls, and this relationship was explained in part by elevated IL-6.Item Prediction of cognitive decline in older breast cancer survivors: the Thinking and Living with Cancer study(Oxford University Press, 2024) McDeed, Arthur Patrick; Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhou, Xingtao; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim A.; Bethea, Traci N.; Carroll, Judith E.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Nakamura, Zev M.; Rentscher, Kelly E.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Small, Brent J.; Root, James C.; Jim, Heather; Patel, Sunita K.; Mcdonald, Brenna C.; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Ahn, Jaeil; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicinePurpose: Cancer survivors commonly report cognitive declines after cancer therapy. Due to the complex etiology of cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD), predicting who will be at risk of CRCD remains a clinical challenge. We developed a model to predict breast cancer survivors who would experience CRCD after systematic treatment. Methods: We used the Thinking and Living with Cancer study, a large ongoing multisite prospective study of older breast cancer survivors with complete assessments pre-systemic therapy, 12 months and 24 months after initiation of systemic therapy. Cognition was measured using neuropsychological testing of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE). CRCD was defined as a 0.25 SD (of observed changes from baseline to 12 months in matched controls) decline or greater in APE score from baseline to 12 months (transient) or persistent as a decline 0.25 SD or greater sustained to 24 months. We used machine learning approaches to predict CRCD using baseline demographics, tumor characteristics and treatment, genotypes, comorbidity, and self-reported physical, psychosocial, and cognitive function. Results: Thirty-two percent of survivors had transient cognitive decline, and 41% of these women experienced persistent decline. Prediction of CRCD was good: yielding an area under the curve of 0.75 and 0.79 for transient and persistent decline, respectively. Variables most informative in predicting CRCD included apolipoprotein E4 positivity, tumor HER2 positivity, obesity, cardiovascular comorbidities, more prescription medications, and higher baseline APE score. Conclusions: Our proof-of-concept tool demonstrates our prediction models are potentially useful to predict risk of CRCD. Future research is needed to validate this approach for predicting CRCD in routine practice settings.Item Protective Effects of APOE ε2 Genotype on Cognition in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study(Oxford University Press, 2021-01-27) Van Dyk, Kathleen; Zhou, Xingtao; Small, Brent J.; Ahn, Jaeil; Zhai, Wanting; Ahles, Tim; Graham, Deena; Jacobsen, Paul B.; Jim, Heather; McDonald, Brenna C.; Nudelman Holohan, Kelly; Patel, Sunita K.; Rebeck, G. William; Root, James C.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Cohen, Harvey Jay; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.; Carroll, Judith E.; Medical and Molecular Genetics, School of MedicineBackground: Cancer-related cognitive decline (CRCD) has been linked to apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene ε4 polymorphisms. APOE ε4 polymorphisms are also the strongest genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD), whereas ε2 polymorphisms protect against AD. However, the effects of ε2 polymorphisms on CRCD have not been evaluated. Methods: We evaluated nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 427) and matched noncancer controls (n = 407) ages 60-98 years assessed presystemic therapy from August 2010 to December 2017 with annual follow-up to 24 months. Neuropsychological assessment measured attention, processing speed, executive function, and learning and memory. Linear mixed-effects models tested the effects of having an ε2 allele (vs none) on longitudinal cognitive domain z scores by treatment group (chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, hormonal therapy, and control) controlling for covariates; participants with ε2/ε4 genotype were excluded. Sensitivity analyses examined effects of other covariates and any ε4 positivity. Results: There was an interaction with genotype for attention, processing speed, and executive functioning domain scores (Beta = 0.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.00 to 0.65); the chemotherapy group with an ε2 allele had higher scores at baseline and maintained higher scores over time compared with those without an ε2 allele, and this protective effect was not seen for other groups. There was no effect of ε2 on learning and memory domain scores. Conclusions: APOE ε2 polymorphisms may protect against CRCD in older breast cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. With replication, this information could be useful for survivorship care and informing future studies of possible links to AD and defining mechanisms of protection.