ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Powelson, John A."

Now showing 1 - 10 of 22
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of methods of providing analgesia after pancreas transplant: IV opioid analgesia versus transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or continuous catheter infusion
    (Wiley, 2019) Yeap, Yar Luan; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Wu, Derrick; Mangus, Richard S.; Kroepf, Elizabeth; Wolfe, John; Powelson, John A.; Anesthesia, School of Medicine
    Background Current practices emphasize a multimodal approach to perioperative analgesia due to higher efficacy and decreased opioid usage. Analgesia for pancreas transplant (PT) has traditionally been managed with intravenous (IV) opioids, and reports of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are limited in this population. Methods Three interventions were compared in adult PT patients, including IV opioids, TAP catheter, and TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine. Time to return of intestinal function and oral diet, postoperative pain scores, opioid usage, and length of stay were recorded. Results Study included 197 PT patients: 62 (32%) standard care, 90 (45%) TAP catheters with continuous 0.2% ropivacaine, and 45 (23%) single liposomal bupivacaine TAP block. Pain scores were lowest for the IV opioid group (P < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group had lower pain scores on postoperative days (POD) 1‐5 than the TAP catheter group. Opioid use during POD 1‐5 was lower for both TAP block groups (P = 0.03). Time to bowel function was faster for the TAP block groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with IV opioid analgesia, TAP block interventions were associated with lower overall use of opioids and a faster time to intestinal function following pancreas transplant.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Congenital anatomic variations in a pancreas allograft: Is this consistent with safe transplant?
    (Elsevier, 2022) Walia, Sonal; Powelson, John A.; Lutz, Andrew J.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Surgery, School of Medicine
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    DELAYED KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION AFTER 83 HOURS OF COLD ISCHEMIA TIME IN COMBINED LIVER-KIDNEY TRANSPLANT
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2019-02) Ekser, Burcin; Chen, Angela M.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mihaylov, Plamen; Goggins, William C.; Powelson, John A.; Surgery, School of Medicine
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Donation After Circulatory Arrest in Pancreas Transplantation: A Report of 10 Cases
    (Elsevier, 2017-12) Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mangus, Richard S.; Thomas, Christopher M.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Powelson, John A.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Introduction Transplantation of pancreas allografts procured from donation after circulatory death (DCD) remains uncommon. This study reviews a series of pancreas transplants at a single center to assess the donor and recipient characteristics for DCD pancreas transplant and to compare clinical outcomes. Methods DCD procurement was performed with a 5-minute wait time from pronouncement of death to first incision. In 2 patients, tissue plasminogen activator was infused as a thrombolytic during the donor flush. All kidney grafts were placed on pulsatile perfusion. Results There were 606 deceased donor pancreas transplants, 596 standard donors and 10 DCD donors. Of the 10 DCD transplants, 6 were simultaneous pancreas-kidney and 4 were pancreas transplant alone. The average time from incision to aortic cannulation was less than 3 minutes. The median total ischemia time for the DCD grafts was 5.4 hours, compared with 8.0 hours for standard donors (P = .15). Median length of hospital stay was 7 days for both groups, and there were no episode of acute cellular rejection in the first year post-transplant for the DCD group (4.2 % for standard group, P = .65). There was no difference in early or late graft survival, with 100% graft survival in the DCD group up to 1 year post-transplant. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier analysis shows similar graft survival for the 2 groups (P = .92). Conclusions These results support the routine use of carefully selected DCD pancreas donors. There were no differences in graft function, postoperative complications, and early and late graft survival.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Excellent outcomes in combined liver-kidney transplantation: Impact of KDPI and delayed kidney transplantation
    (Wiley, 2017) Ekser, Burcin; Mangus, Richard S.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Powelson, John A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Goggins, William C.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    The positive impact of delayed kidney transplantation (KT) on patient survival for combined liver-KT (CLKT) has already been demonstrated by our group. The purpose of this study is to identify whether the quality of the kidneys (based on KDPI) or the delayed approach KT contributes to improved patient survival. 130 CLKT were performed between 2002-2015; 69 with simultaneous KT (Group S) and 61 with delayed KT (Group D) (performed as a second operation with a mean cold ischemia time [CIT] of 50±15h). All patients were categorized according to the KDPI score; 1-33%, 34-66%, and 67-99%. Recipient and donor characteristics were comparable within Groups S and D. Transplant outcomes were comparable within Groups S and D, including liver and kidney CIT, warm ischemia time, and delayed graft function. Lower KDPI kidneys (<34%) were associated with increased patient survival in both groups. Combination of delayed KT and KDPI 1-33% resulted in 100% patient survival at 3-years. These results support that delayed KT in CLKT improves patient survival. The combination of delayed KT and low KDPI offers excellent patient survival up to 3-years. Improved outcomes in the delayed KT group including high KDPI kidneys supports expansion of the donor pool with the use of more ECD and DCD kidneys.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Deceased Donor Cardiac Arrest Time on Postpancreas Transplant Graft Function and Survival
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2018-08-21) Schoering, Joel R.; Mangus, Richard S.; Powelson, John A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Introduction: Transplantation of pancreas allografts from donors that have experienced preprocurement cardiopulmonary arrest (PPCA) is not common, though use of PPCA grafts is routine in liver and kidney transplantation. This article reviews a large number of PPCA pancreas grafts at a single center and reports posttransplant outcomes including early graft dysfunction, length of hospital stay, rejection, and early and late graft survival. Methods: Preprocurement cardiopulmonary arrest, arrest time, and donor and recipient pancreatic enzyme levels were collected from electronic and written medical records. The PPCA donors were stratified into 4 groups: none, less than 20 minutes, 20-39 minutes, and 40 minutes or greater. Graft survival was assessed at 7 and 90 days and at 1 year. Long-term graft survival was assessed by Cox regression analysis. Results: The records of 606 pancreas transplants were reviewed, including 328 (54%) simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants. Preprocurement cardiopulmonary arrest occurred in 176 donors (29%; median time, 20 minutes). Median peak donor lipase was higher in PPCA donors (40 μ/L vs 29 μ/L, P = 0.02). Posttransplant, peak recipient amylase, and lipase levels were similar (P = 0.63). Prolonged arrest time (>40 minutes) was associated with higher donor peak lipase and lower recipient peak amylase (P = 0.05 for both). Stratified by donor arrest time, there was no difference in 7-day, 90-day, or 1-year graft survival. Cox regression comparing the 4 groups demonstrated no statistical difference in 10-year survival. Conclusions: These results support transplantation of pancreas allografts from PPCA donors. Prolonged asystole was associated with higher peak donor serum lipase but lower peak recipient serum amylase. There were no differences in allograft survival.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Gastroparesis on Outcomes After Pancreas Transplantation
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2025-04-09) Fridell, Jonathan A.; Chen, Jeanne M.; Kerby, Emily A.; Marshall, William A.; Lutz, Andrew J.; Powelson, John A.; Mangus, Richard S.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background: Gastroparesis (GP) is a chronic disorder of the stomach characterized by delayed gastric emptying and frequently associated with longstanding diabetes. This is a single-center retrospective analysis designed to establish the prevalence and assess the impact on posttransplant outcomes of GP among pancreas transplant recipients. Methods: Medical records for all recipients of pancreas transplants performed between January 2003 and December 2023 were reviewed. GP was defined by abnormal gastric-emptying scintigraphy or other motility study or a history of symptoms. Primary outcomes included graft loss and patient death. Clinical outcomes included length of stay after transplant and readmissions, including specifically for GP symptoms. Results: Of 731 recipients, 156 (21%) were diagnosed with GP before transplant. Patients with GP were younger and more likely to be female individuals. Posttransplant, there was no difference in length of stay, graft survival, or patient survival. Patients with GP were more likely to be readmitted and to be specifically admitted for GP symptoms. Requirement for interventions was more common in patients with GP. Conclusions: GP is identified with increased frequency among the specific patient population referred for pancreas transplant, and although it does not seem to affect allograft or patient survival, it does seem to have an impact on readmissions and the need for interventions.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Recipient Age in Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation: Caution Is Needed for Patients ≥70 Years
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020-06) Ekser, Burcin; Goggins, William C.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mihaylov, Plamen; Mangus, Richard S.; Lutz, Andrew J.; Soma, Daiki; Ghabril, Marwan S.; Lacerda, Marco A.; Powelson, John A.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background. Elderly recipients (≥70 y) account for 2.6% of all liver transplants (LTs) in the United States and have similar outcomes as younger recipients. Although the rate of elderly recipients in combined liver-kidney transplant (CLKT) is similar, limited data are available on how elderly recipients perform after CLKT. Methods. We have previously shown excellent outcomes in CLKT using delayed kidney transplant (Indiana) Approach (mean kidney cold ischemia time = 53 ± 14 h). Between 2007 and 2018, 98 CLKTs were performed using the Indiana Approach at Indiana University (IU) and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Recipients were subgrouped based on their age: 18–45 (n = 16), 46–59 (n = 34), 60–69 (n = 40), and ≥70 years (n = 8). Results. Overall, more elderly patients received LT at IU (5.2%) when compared nationally (2.6%). The rate of elderly recipients in CLKT at IU was 8.2% (versus 2% Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient). Recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between all age groups except recipient age and duration of dialysis. Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was similar among younger age groups, whereas patient survival was significantly lower in elderly recipients at 1 (60%) and 3 years (40%) (P = 0.0077). Control analyses (replicating Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient’s survival stratification: 18–45, 46–64, ≥65 y) showed similar patient survival in all age groups. Conclusions. Although LT can be safely performed in elderly recipients, extreme caution is needed in CLKT due to the magnitude of operation.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of Recipient Age in Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation: Caution Is Needed for Patients ≥70 Years
    (Wolters Kluwer, 2020-06-01) Ekser, Burcin; Goggins, William C.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mihaylov, Plamen; Mangus, Richard S.; Lutz, Andrew J.; Soma, Daiki; Ghabril, Marwan S.; Lacerda, Marco A.; Powelson, John A.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Surgery, School of Medicine
    Background. Elderly recipients (≥70 y) account for 2.6% of all liver transplants (LTs) in the United States and have similar outcomes as younger recipients. Although the rate of elderly recipients in combined liver-kidney transplant (CLKT) is similar, limited data are available on how elderly recipients perform after CLKT. Methods. We have previously shown excellent outcomes in CLKT using delayed kidney transplant (Indiana) Approach (mean kidney cold ischemia time = 53 ± 14 h). Between 2007 and 2018, 98 CLKTs were performed using the Indiana Approach at Indiana University (IU) and the data were retrospectively analyzed. Recipients were subgrouped based on their age: 18–45 (n = 16), 46–59 (n = 34), 60–69 (n = 40), and ≥70 years (n = 8). Results. Overall, more elderly patients received LT at IU (5.2%) when compared nationally (2.6%). The rate of elderly recipients in CLKT at IU was 8.2% (versus 2% Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient). Recipient and donor characteristics were comparable between all age groups except recipient age and duration of dialysis. Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was similar among younger age groups, whereas patient survival was significantly lower in elderly recipients at 1 (60%) and 3 years (40%) (P = 0.0077). Control analyses (replicating Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient’s survival stratification: 18–45, 46–64, ≥65 y) showed similar patient survival in all age groups. Conclusions. Although LT can be safely performed in elderly recipients, extreme caution is needed in CLKT due to the magnitude of operation.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Is the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) universal or UNOS-specific?
    (Wiley, 2017) Ekser, Burcin; Powelson, John A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Goggins, William C.; Taber, Tim E.; Surgery, School of Medicine
  • «
  • 1 (current)
  • 2
  • 3
  • »
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University