ScholarWorksIndianapolis
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse ScholarWorks
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Obri, Mark"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Intra-Abdominal Abscess Using 15-mm vs. 10-mm Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents: An International Case-Matched Study
    (Elsevier, 2025) Ichkhanian, Yervant; Chaudhary, Ammad J.; Veracruz, Nicolette; Faisal, Muhammad Salman; Peller, Matthew; Kushnir, Vladimir; Daugherty, T. Tyler; Genere, Juan Reyes; Pawa, Rishi; Pawa, Swati; Ahmed, Wafaa; Huggett, Matthew T.; Paranandi, Bharat; Aparicio, José Ramón; Martínez-Moreno, Belén; Nimri, Faisal; Ashraf, Taha; Alluri, Spandana; Obri, Mark; Dang, Duyen; Singla, Sumit; Piraka, Cyrus; Zuchelli, Tobias; Medicine, School of Medicine
    Background and Aims Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided placement of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has been reported yet advantage of using 15-mm LAMS over 10-mm LAMS yet to be explored. Methods International, retrospective, case-matched study of patients with intra-abdominal abscess who underwent EUS-guided drainage with 15-mm (case) and 10-mm (control) LAMS between 03/2019 and 09/2022. Results 51 patients underwent EUS-guided drainage using LAMS [15-mm 29 (57%), 10-mm 22 (43%)]. The most common location of the abscess was peri-pancreatic 43%. Technical success rate was achieved in 97% of cases and 100 % of controls (p=0.412), while clinical success was achieved in 98% and 96%, respectively, (OR 1.3; p=0.089). AE occurred in 7.8% of the cases. Patients with 15-mm LAMS underwent fewer total endoscopic procedures (mean 2.5 vs.3.6; P < 0.023). Conclusion Both sizes showed comparable clinical success and safety profiles, with a significant trend of the need for fewer endoscopic procedures with the 15-mm LAMS.
About IU Indianapolis ScholarWorks
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy Notice
  • Copyright © 2025 The Trustees of Indiana University