Browsing by Author "Nesemeier, B. Ryan"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Aerosol and droplet generation from mandible and midface fixation: Surgical risk in the pandemic era
    (Elsevier, 2021-01) Ye, Michael J.; Sharma, Dhruv; Campiti, Vincent J.; Rubel, Kolin E.; Burgin, Sarah J.; Illing, Elisa A.; Ting, Jonathan Y.; Hong Park, Jae; Johnson, Jeffrey D.; Vernon, Dominic J.; Lee, Hui Bae; Nesemeier, B. Ryan; Shipchandler, Taha Z.; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has led to concerns over transmission risk from healthcare procedures, especially when operating in the head and neck such as during surgical repair of facial fractures. This study aims to quantify aerosol and droplet generation from mandibular and midface open fixation and measure mitigation of airborne particles by a smoke evacuating electrocautery hand piece. Materials and methods The soft tissue of the bilateral mandible and midface of two fresh frozen cadaveric specimens was infiltrated using a 0.1% fluorescein solution. Surgical fixation via oral vestibular approach was performed on each of these sites. Droplet splatter on the surgeon's chest, facemask, and up to 198.12 cm (6.5 ft) away from each surgical site was measured against a blue background under ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light. Aerosol generation was measured using an optical particle sizer. Results No visible droplet contamination was observed for any trials of mandible or midface fixation. Total aerosolized particle counts from 0.300–10.000 μm were increased compared to baseline following each use of standard electrocautery (n = 4, p < 0.001) but not with use of a suction evacuating electrocautery hand piece (n = 4, p = 0.103). Total particle counts were also increased during use of the powered drill (n = 8, p < 0.001). Conclusions Risk from visible droplets during mandible and midface fixation is low. However, significant increases in aerosolized particles were measured after electrocautery use and during powered drilling. Aerosol dispersion is significantly decreased with the use of a smoke evacuating electrocautery hand piece.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Aerosol and droplet generation from orbital repair: Surgical risk in the pandemic era
    (Elsevier, 2021) Ye, Michael J.; Vadhul, Raghav B.; Sharma, Dhruv; Campiti, Vincent J.; Burgin, Sarah J.; Illing, Elisa A.; Ting, Jonathan Y.; Hong Park, Jae; Koehler, Karl R.; Lee, Hui Bae; Vernon, Dominic J.; Johnson, Jeffrey D.; Nesemeier, B. Ryan; Shipchandler, Taha Z.; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    Introduction The highly contagious COVID-19 has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide. Physicians performing orbital procedures may be at increased risk of occupational exposure to the virus due to exposure to secretions. The goal of this study is to measure the droplet and aerosol production during repair of the inferior orbital rim and trial a smoke-evacuating electrocautery handpiece as a mitigation device. Material and methods The inferior rim of 6 cadaveric orbits was approached transconjunctivally using either standard or smoke-evacuator electrocautery and plated using a high-speed drill. Following fluorescein inoculation, droplet generation was measured by counting under ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light against a blue background. Aerosol generation from 0.300–10.000 μm was measured using an optical particle sizer. Droplet and aerosol generation was compared against retraction of the orbital soft tissue as a negative control. Results No droplets were observed following the orbital approach using electrocautery. Visible droplets were observed after plating with a high-speed drill for 3 of 6 orbits. Total aerosol generation was significantly higher than negative control following the use of standard electrocautery. Use of smoke-evacuator electrocautery was associated with significantly lower aerosol generation in 2 of 3 size groups and in total. There was no significant increase in total aerosols associated with high-speed drilling. Discussion and conclusions Droplet generation for orbital repair was present only following plating with high-speed drill. Aerosol generation during standard electrocautery was significantly reduced using a smoke-evacuating electrocautery handpiece. Aerosols were not significantly increased by high-speed drilling.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Otolaryngologists’ Role in Redeployment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Commentary
    (Sage, 2020) Shipchandler, Taha Z.; Nesemeier, B. Ryan; Schmalbach, Cecelia E.; Ting, Jonathan Y.; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    As otolaryngologists, we identify as subspecialists and fellowship-trained surgeons and may even identify as “super-subspecialists.” The likelihood of being redeployed and drawing from knowledge learned during our postgraduate year 1 training seemed exceedingly unlikely until physician resources became scarce in some health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic. More now than ever, it is evident that our broad training is valuable in helping patients and allowing the otolaryngologist to meaningfully contribute to the larger health care community, especially while the majority (70%-95%) of elective care is delayed. With our skill set, otolaryngologists are poised to support various aspects of hospital wards, intensive care units, emergency departments, and beyond.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reverse-Surge Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cautionary Ramp-up for the Otolaryngologist
    (Sage, 2020-12) Shipchandler, Taha Z.; Nesemeier, B. Ryan; Barnes, Kaitlyn J.; Kelly, Leah R.; Schmalbach, Cecelia E.; Ting, Jonathan Y.; Otolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine
    As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to evolve through the United States and other countries, differing rates of progression and decline are occurring based on varied population densities. While some health systems are reaching a steady state of new patient cases, others are seeing a leveling off or decline, allowing for restoration of normal practices. This “reverse-surge” planning and implementation process is a colossal undertaking for health systems trying to reacquire patient access and financial stability while preserving necessary resources and maintaining precautions for another potential surge. For the otolaryngologist, reverse-surge planning involves additional workflow adjustments in the outpatient and operating room settings given the abundance of COVID-19 virus in the upper aerodigestive tract. As the reverse-surge best practices are still under development, open communication between otolaryngology colleagues and health system leadership is paramount to optimize efficiency and maintain an adequate measure of safety for patients and our health care teams.