- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Long, David E."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Effects of Proton Center Closure on Pediatric Case Volume and Resident Education at an Academic Cancer Center(Elsevier, 2018-03) Galle, James O.; Long, David E.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Zellars, Richard C.; Watson, Gordon A.; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicinePurpose To analyze effects of closure of an academic proton treatment center (PTC) on pediatric case volume, distribution, and resident education. Methods and Materials This was a review of 412 consecutive pediatric (age ≤18 years) cases treated at a single institution from 2012 to 2016. Residents' Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for the same years were also analyzed. Characteristics of the patient population and resident case volumes before and after closure of the PTC are reported. Results Overall pediatric new starts declined by approximately 50%, from 35 to 70 per 6 months in 2012 to 2014 to 22 to 30 per 6 months in 2015 to 2016. Central nervous system (CNS) case volume declined sharply, from 121 patients treated in 2012 to 2015 to 18 patients in 2015 to 2016. In 2012 to 2014 our institution treated 36, 24, and 17 patients for medulloblastoma/intracranial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, ependymoma, and low-grade glioma, respectively, compared with 0, 1, and 1 patient(s) in 2015 to 2016. Forty-nine patients were treated with craniospinal radiation (CSI) from 2012 to 2014, whereas only 2 patients underwent CSI between 2015 and 2016. Hematologic malignancy patient volume and use of total body irradiation remained relatively stable. Patients treated when the PTC was open were significantly younger (9.1 vs 10.7 years, P=.010) and their radiation courses were longer (35.4 vs 20.9 days, P<.0001) than those treated after its closure. Resident case logs showed only a small decline in total pediatric cases, because the percentage of pediatric cases covered by residents increased after PTC closure; however, residents logged fewer CNS cases after PTC closure versus before. Conclusions Overall pediatric case volume decreased after PTC closure, as did the number of patients treated for potentially curable CNS tumors. Our findings raise important questions regarding resident training in pediatric radiation oncology as these cases become increasingly concentrated at specialized centers.Item Functional liver-image guided hepatic therapy (FLIGHT): A technique to maximize hepatic functional reserve(Elsevier, 2020-06) Furukawa, Yukie; Long, David E.; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineIntroduction: Radiation planning approaches for liver radiation often do not consider the regional variation that can exist in liver function. This study dosimetrically compares functional liver image-guided hepatic therapy (FLIGHT) to standard stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans. In the FLIGHT plans, functional data from hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans serve as a road map to guide beam arrangement. While meeting the same target volume coverage, plans are optimized to reduce dose to high-functioning liver. Materials and Methods: The study included 10 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with baseline HIDA SPECT imaging. Standard SBRT plans which did not systematically incorporate these scans had previously been completed on all 10 plans. Retrospectively, FLIGHT plans were created based on the use of contours of relative liver function from the HIDA SPECT as avoidance structures. Resulting dose to each relative functional liver structure was examined and compared qualitatively and using Wilcoxin rank-sum tests. Target coverage, doses to organs at risk (OARs), conformity index (CI), and gradient index (GI) were also evaluated. Results: While maintaining the same target coverage, FLIGHT plans reduced the mean dose to the high functioning liver by a median of 3.0 Gy (range 0.7 to 4.6 Gy), which represented a 31.4% mean reduction compared to standard planning. FLIGHT plans reduced the volume of high functioning liver receiving 15 Gy by a mean of 59.3 cc (range 7 to 170 cc), for a mean reduction of 41.9%. The mean dose to areas of liver function defined by 25% to 100% and 50% to 100% maximum was reduced with FLIGHT from 10.5 Gy to 8.5 Gy and from 10.5 Gy to 7.5 Gy, respectively ( p < 0.005 for both comparisons). The FLIGHT plans’ mean CI and GI did not differ significantly from the standard plans’ ( p = 0.721 and 0.169, respectively). Conclusion: FLIGHT SBRT allows for field design and plan optimization individualized to a patient's baseline regional liver function to maximize hepatic functional reserve. This personalized approach is achieved without compromising target coverage or OAR sparing.Item Radioluminescent nanoparticles for radiation-controlled release of drugs(Elsevier, 2019-06) Misra, Rahul; Sarkar, Kaustabh; Lee, Jaewon; Pizzuti, Vincenzo J.; Lee, Deborah S.; Currie, Melanie P.; Torregrosa-Allen, Sandra E.; Long, David E.; Durm, Gregory A.; Langer, Mark P.; Elzey, Bennett D.; Won, You-Yeon; Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe present work demonstrates a novel concept for intratumoral chemo-radio combination therapy for locally advanced solid tumors. For some locally advanced tumors, chemoradiation is currently standard of care. This combination treatment can cause acute and long term toxicity that can limit its use in older patients or those with multiple medical comorbidities. Intratumoral chemotherapy has the potential to address the problem of systemic toxicity that conventional chemotherapy suffers, and may, in our view, be a better strategy for treating certain locally advanced tumors. The present study proposes how intratumoral chemoradiation can be best implemented. The enabling concept is the use of a new chemotherapeutic formulation in which chemotherapy drugs (e.g., paclitaxel (PTX)) are co-encapsulated with radioluminecsnt nanoparticles (e.g., CaWO4 (CWO) nanoparticles (NPs)) within protective capsules formed by biocompatible/biodegradable polymers (e.g., poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic acid) or PEG-PLA). This drug-loaded polymer-encapsulated radioluminescent nanoparticle system can be locally injected in solution form into the patient's tumor before the patient receives normal radiotherapy (e.g., 30–40 fractions of 2–3 Gy daily X-ray dose delivered over several weeks for locally advanced head and neck tumors). Under X-ray irradiation, the radioluminescent nanoparticles produce UV-A light that has a radio-sensitizing effect. These co-encapsulated radioluminescent nanoparticles also enable radiation-triggered release of chemo drugs from the polymer coating layer. The non-toxic nature (absence of dark toxicity) of this drug-loaded polymer-encapsulated radioluminescent nanoparticle (“PEG-PLA/CWO/PTX”) formulation was confirmed by the MTT assay in cancer cell cultures. A clonogenic cell survival assay confirmed that these drug-loaded polymer-encapsulated radioluminescent nanoparticles significantly enhance the cancer cell killing effect of radiation therapy. In vivo study validated the efficacy of PEG-PLA/CWO/PTX-based intratumoral chemo-radio therapy in mouse tumor xenografts (in terms of tumor response and mouse survival). Results of a small-scale NP biodistribution (BD) study demonstrate that PEG-PLA/CWO/PTX NPs remained at the tumor sites for a long period of time (> 1 month) following direct intratumoral administration. A multi-compartmental pharmacokinetic model (with rate constants estimated from in vitro experiments) predicts that this radiation-controlled drug release technology enables significant improvements in the level and duration of drug availability within the tumor (throughout the typical length of radiation treatment, i.e., > 1 month) over conventional delivery systems (e.g., PEG-PLA micelles with no co-encapsulated CaWO4, or an organic liquid, e.g., a 50:50 mixture of Cremophor EL and ethanol, as in Taxol), while it is capable of maintaining the systemic level of the chemo drug far below the toxic threshold limit over the entire treatment period. This technology thus has the potential to offer a new therapeutic option that has not previously been available for patients excluded from conventional chemoradiation protocols.