- Browse by Author
Browsing by Author "Kerridge, William D."
Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item The 2014 Moreton Lecture: A Rebuttal(Elsevier, 2015-07) Borthakur, Gitasree; Kerridge, William D.; Ballenger, Zachary; Gunderman, Richard B.; Department of Radiology and Imaging, IU School of MedicineItem Fat Necrosis of the Breast: A Pictorial Review of the Mammographic, Ultrasound, CT, and MRI Findings with Histopathologic Correlation(Hindawi, 2015-03-16) Kerridge, William D.; Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.; Thompson, Afua; Shah, Biren A.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineFat necrosis of the breast is a challenging diagnosis due to the various appearances on mammography, ultrasound, CT, PET-CT, and MRI. Although mammography is more specific, ultrasound is a very important tool in making the diagnosis of fat necrosis. MRI has a wide spectrum of findings for fat necrosis and the appearance is the result of the amount of the inflammatory reaction, the amount of liquefied fat, and the degree of fibrosis. While CT and PET-CT are not first line imaging examinations for the diagnosis of breast cancer or fat necrosis, they are frequently performed in the surveillance and staging of disease. Knowledge of how fat necrosis presents on these additional imaging techniques is important to prevent misinterpretation of the imaging findings. Gross and microscopic appearances of fat necrosis depend on the age of the lesion; the histologic examination of fat necrosis is usually straightforward. Knowledge of the variable appearances of fat necrosis on a vast array of imaging modalities will enhance a radiologist's accuracy in the analysis and interpretation of fat necrosis versus other diagnoses.Item A Leadership Development Program for Radiology Residents(Elsevier, 2017-11) Heitkamp, Darel E.; Kerridge, William D.; Ballenger, Zachary E.; Tawadros, Alexander M.; Gunderman, Richard B.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineItem Service Learning in Radiology Education(Elsevier, 2017-03) Gasparis, Pauley T.; Kerridge, William D.; Gunderman, Richard B.; Radiology and Imaging Sciences, School of MedicineItem The Validity and Timing of the ABR Core Exam(Elsevier, 2016-09) Kerridge, William D.; Gunderman, Richard B.; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, IU School of MedicineThe American Board of Radiology's (ABR) new Core Exam is not working, at least not as well as it needs to. Having helped to prepare candidates (RG), studied for and taken the exam (WK), and talked with hundreds of candidates who have taken the exam (RG and WK), we believe that that one aspect of the exam, its validity, can be significantly enhanced. Just as we expect candidates for board certification and practicing radiologists to measure up to the high standards, so we should subject the board exam to continuous scrutiny, seeking opportunities to rectify errors and enhance the exam's overall quality, with a view to better promoting excellence in radiology practice and the care of patients. Here we focus on two exam parameters: validity and timing.