Browsing by Author "Guo, Jiaying"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Bayesian Adaptive Designs for Early Phase Clinical Trials
    (2023-07) Guo, Jiaying; Zang, Yong; Han, Jiali; Zhao, Yi; Ren, Jie
    Delayed toxicity outcomes are common in phase I clinical trials, especially in oncology studies. It causes logistic difficulty, wastes resources, and prolongs the trial duration. We propose the time-to-event 3+3 (T-3+3) design to solve the delayed outcome issue for the 3+3 design. We convert the dose decision rules of the 3+3 design into a series of events. A transparent yet efficient Bayesian probability model is applied to calculate the event happening probabilities in the presence of delayed outcomes, which incorporates the informative pending patients' remaining follow-up time into consideration. The T-3+3 design only models the information for the pending patients and seamlessly reduces to the conventional 3+3 design in the absence of delayed outcomes. We further extend the proposed method to interval 3+3 (i3+3) design, an algorithm-based phase I dose-finding design which is based on simple but more comprehensive rules that account for the variabilities in the observed data. Similarly, the dose escalation/deescalation decision is recommended by comparing the event happening probabilities which are calculated by considering the ratio between the averaged follow-up time for at-risk patients and the total assessment window. We evaluate the operating characteristics of the proposed designs through simulation studies and compare them to existing methods. The umbrella trial is a clinical trial strategy that accommodates the paradigm shift towards personalized medicine, which evaluates multiple investigational drugs in different subgroups of patients with the same disease. A Bayesian adaptive umbrella trial design is proposed to select effective targeted agents for different biomarker-based subgroups of patients. To facilitate treatment evaluation, the design uses a mixture regression model that jointly models short-term and long-term response outcomes. In addition, a data-driven latent class model is employed to adaptively combine subgroups into induced latent classes based on overall data heterogeneities, which improves the statistical power of the umbrella trial. To enhance individual ethics, the design includes a response-adaptive randomization scheme with early stopping rules for futility and superiority. Bayesian posterior probabilities are used to make these decisions. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed design outperforms two conventional designs across a range of practical treatment-outcome scenarios.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    T3 + 3: 3 + 3 Design With Delayed Outcomes
    (Wiley, 2024) Guo, Jiaying; Lu, Mengyi; Wan, Isabella; Wang, Yumin; Han, Leng; Zang, Yong; Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health
    Delayed outcome is common in phase I oncology clinical trials. It causes logistic difficulty, wastes resources, and prolongs the trial duration. This article investigates this issue and proposes the time-to-event 3 + 3 (T3 + 3) design, which utilizes the actual follow-up time for at-risk patients with pending toxicity outcomes. The T3 + 3 design allows continuous accrual without unnecessary trial suspension and is costless and implementable with pretabulated dose decision rules. Besides, the T3 + 3 design uses the isotonic regression to estimate the toxicity rates across dose levels and therefore can accommodate for any targeted toxicity rate for maximum tolerated dose (MTD). It dramatically facilitates the trial preparation and conduct without intensive computation and statistical consultation. The extension to other algorithm-based phase I dose-finding designs (e.g., i3 + 3 design) is also studied. Comprehensive computer simulation studies are conducted to investigate the performance of the T3 + 3 design under various dose-toxicity scenarios. The results confirm that the T3 + 3 design substantially shortens the trial duration compared with the conventional 3 + 3 design and yields much higher accuracy in MTD identification than the rolling six design. In summary, the T3 + 3 design addresses the delayed outcome issue while keeping the desirable features of the 3 + 3 design, such as simplicity, transparency, and costless implementation. It has great potential to accelerate early-phase drug development.