Browsing by Author "Fridell, Jonathan A."
Now showing 1 - 10 of 41
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Analyzing outcomes following pancreas transplantation: Definition of a failure or failure of a definition(Wiley, 2022) Stratta, Robert J.; Farney, Alan C.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Surgery, School of MedicinePancreas transplantation has an identity crisis and is at a crossroads. Although outcomes continue to improve in each successive era, the number of pancreas transplants performed annually in the United States has been static for several years in spite of increasing numbers of deceased donors. For most practitioners who manage diabetes, pancreas transplantation is considered an extreme measure to control diabetes. With expanded recipient selection (primarily simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation) in patients who are older, have a higher BMI, are minorities, or who have a type 2 diabetes phenotype, the controversy regarding type of diabetes detracts from the success of intervention. The absence of a clear and precise definition of pancreas graft failure, particularly one that lacks a measure of glycemic control, inhibits wider application of pancreas transplantation with respect to reporting long-term outcomes, comparing this treatment to alternative therapies, developing listing and allocation policy, and having a better understanding of the patient perspective. It has been suggested that the definition of pancreas graft failure should differ depending on the type of pretransplant diabetes. In this commentary, we discuss current challenges regarding the development of a uniform definition of pancreas graft failure and propose a potential solution to this vexing problem.Item Broadened Allocation of Pancreas Transplants Across Compatible ABO Blood Types(Elsevier, 2017-12) Fridell, Jonathan A.; Gustafson, Sally K.; Thompson, Bryn W.; Fox, Abigail C.; Prentice, Matthew A.; Curry, Michael A.; Odorico, Jon S.; Surgery, School of MedicineBackground Current Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy restricts certain blood type-compatible simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants. Using the Kidney Pancreas Simulated Allocation Model, we examined the effects of 5 alternative allocation sequences that allowed all clinically compatible ABO transplants. Methods The study cohort included kidney (KI), SPK, and pancreas alone (PA) candidates waiting for transplant for at least 1 day between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010 (full cohort), and kidneys and pancreata recovered for transplant during the same period. Additionally, because the waiting list has shrunk since 2010, the study population was reduced by random sampling to match the volume of the 2015 waiting list (reduced cohort). Results Compared with the current allocation sequence, R4 and R5 both showed an increase in SPK transplants, a nearly corresponding decrease in KI transplants, and virtually no change in PA transplants. Life-years from transplant and median years of benefit also increased. The distribution of transplants by blood type changed, with more ABO:A, B, and AB transplants performed, and fewer ABO:O across all transplant types (KI, SPK, PA), with the relative percent changes largest for SPK. Discussion Broadened ABO compatibility allowances primarily benefitted SPK ABO:A and AB candidates. ABO:O candidates saw potentially reduced access to transplant. The simulation results suggest that modifying the current allocation sequence to incorporate broadened ABO compatibility can result in an increase in annual SPK transplants.Item CAD-LT score effectively predicts risk of significant coronary artery disease in liver transplant candidates(Elsevier, 2021-07) Rachwan, Rayan Jo; Kutkut, Issa; Timsina, Lava R.; Chaaya, Rody G. Bou; El-Am, Edward A.; Sabra, Mohammad; Mshelbwala, Fakilahyel S.; Rahal, Mahmoud A.; Lacerda, Marco A.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Ghabril, Marwan S.; Bourdillon, Patrick D.; Mangus, Richard S.; Surgery, School of MedicineBackground & Aims Patients with cirrhosis and significant coronary artery disease (CAD) are at risk of peri-liver transplantation (LT) cardiac events. The coronary artery disease in liver transplantation (CAD-LT) score and algorithm aim to predict the risk of significant CAD in LT candidates and guide pre-LT cardiac evaluation. Methods Patients who underwent pre-LT evaluation at Indiana University (2010-2019) were studied retrospectively. Stress echocardiography (SE) and cardiac catheterization (CATH) reports were reviewed. CATH was performed for predefined CAD risk factors, irrespective of normal SE. Significant CAD was defined as CAD requiring percutaneous or surgical intervention. A multivariate regression model was constructed to assess risk factors. Receiver-operating curve analysis was used to compute a point-based risk score and a stratified testing algorithm. Results A total of 1,771 pre-LT patients underwent cardiac evaluation, including results from 1,634 SE and 1,266 CATH assessments. Risk-adjusted predictors of significant CAD at CATH were older age (adjusted odds ratio 1.05; 95% CI 1.03–1.08), male sex (1.69; 1.16–2.50), diabetes (1.57; 1.12–2.22), hypertension (1.61; 1.14–2.28), tobacco use (pack years) (1.01; 1.00–1.02), family history of CAD (1.63; 1.16–2.28), and personal history of CAD (6.55; 4.33–9.90). The CAD-LT score stratified significant CAD risk as low (≤2%), intermediate (3% to 9%), and high (≥10%). Among patients who underwent CATH, a risk-based testing algorithm (low: no testing; intermediate: non-invasive testing vs. CATH; high: CATH) would have identified 97% of all significant CAD and potentially avoided unnecessary testing (669 SE [57%] and 561 CATH [44%]). Conclusions The CAD-LT score and algorithm (available at www.cad-lt.com) effectively stratify pre-LT risk for significant CAD. This may guide more targeted testing of candidates with fewer tests and faster time to waitlist. Lay summary The coronary artery disease in liver transplantation (CAD-LT) score and algorithm effectively stratify patients based on their risk of significant coronary artery disease. The CAD-LT algorithm can be used to guide a more targeted cardiac evaluation prior to liver transplantation.Item Comparison of methods of providing analgesia after pancreas transplant: IV opioid analgesia versus transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or continuous catheter infusion(Wiley, 2019) Yeap, Yar Luan; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Wu, Derrick; Mangus, Richard S.; Kroepf, Elizabeth; Wolfe, John; Powelson, John A.; Anesthesia, School of MedicineBackground Current practices emphasize a multimodal approach to perioperative analgesia due to higher efficacy and decreased opioid usage. Analgesia for pancreas transplant (PT) has traditionally been managed with intravenous (IV) opioids, and reports of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are limited in this population. Methods Three interventions were compared in adult PT patients, including IV opioids, TAP catheter, and TAP block with liposomal bupivacaine. Time to return of intestinal function and oral diet, postoperative pain scores, opioid usage, and length of stay were recorded. Results Study included 197 PT patients: 62 (32%) standard care, 90 (45%) TAP catheters with continuous 0.2% ropivacaine, and 45 (23%) single liposomal bupivacaine TAP block. Pain scores were lowest for the IV opioid group (P < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group had lower pain scores on postoperative days (POD) 1‐5 than the TAP catheter group. Opioid use during POD 1‐5 was lower for both TAP block groups (P = 0.03). Time to bowel function was faster for the TAP block groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with IV opioid analgesia, TAP block interventions were associated with lower overall use of opioids and a faster time to intestinal function following pancreas transplant.Item Congenital anatomic variations in a pancreas allograft: Is this consistent with safe transplant?(Elsevier, 2022) Walia, Sonal; Powelson, John A.; Lutz, Andrew J.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Surgery, School of MedicineItem DELAYED KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION AFTER 83 HOURS OF COLD ISCHEMIA TIME IN COMBINED LIVER-KIDNEY TRANSPLANT(Wolters Kluwer, 2019-02) Ekser, Burcin; Chen, Angela M.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mihaylov, Plamen; Goggins, William C.; Powelson, John A.; Surgery, School of MedicineItem The demise of islet allotransplantation in the United States: A call for an urgent regulatory update(Wiley, 2021-04) Witkowski, Piotr; Philipson, Louis H.; Kaufman, Dixon B.; Ratner, Lloyd E.; Abouljoud, Marwan S.; Bellin, Melena D.; Buse, John B.; Kandeel, Fouad; Stock, Peter G.; Mulligan, David C.; Markmann, James F.; Kozlowski, Tomasz; Andreoni, Kenneth A.; Alejandro, Rodolfo; Baidal, David A.; Hardy, Mark A.; Wickrema, Amittha; Mirmira, Raghavendra G.; Fung, John; Becker, Yolanda T.; Josephson, Michelle A.; Bachul, Piotr J.; Pyda, Jordan S.; Charlton, Michael; Millis, J. Michael; Gaglia, Jason L.; Stratta, Robert J.; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Niederhaus, Silke V.; Forbes, Rachael C.; Jayant, Kumar; Robertson, R. Paul; Odorico, Jon S.; Levy, Marlon F.; Harland, Robert C.; Abrams, Peter L.; Olaitan, Oyedolamu K.; Kandaswamy, Raja; Wellen, Jason R.; Japour, Anthony J.; Desai, Chirag S.; Naziruddin, Bashoo; Balamurugan, Appakalai N.; Barth, Rolf N.; Ricordi, Camillo; Surgery, School of MedicineIslet allotransplantation in the United States (US) is facing an imminent demise. Despite nearly three decades of progress in the field, an archaic regulatory framework has stymied US clinical practice. Current regulations do not reflect the state-of-the-art in clinical or technical practices. In the US, islets are considered biologic drugs and “more than minimally manipulated” human cell and tissue products (HCT/Ps). In contrast, across the world, human islets are appropriately defined as “minimally manipulated tissue” and not regulated as a drug, which has led to islet allotransplantation (allo-ITx) becoming a standard-of-care procedure for selected patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This regulatory distinction impedes patient access to islets for transplantation in the US. As a result only 11 patients underwent allo-ITx in the US between 2016 and 2019, and all as investigational procedures in the settings of a clinical trials. Herein, we describe the current regulations pertaining to islet transplantation in the United States. We explore the progress which has been made in the field and demonstrate why the regulatory framework must be updated to both better reflect our current clinical practice and to deal with upcoming challenges. We propose specific updates to current regulations which are required for the renaissance of ethical, safe, effective, and affordable allo-ITx in the United States.Item Donation After Circulatory Arrest in Pancreas Transplantation: A Report of 10 Cases(Elsevier, 2017-12) Fridell, Jonathan A.; Mangus, Richard S.; Thomas, Christopher M.; Kubal, Chandrashekhar A.; Powelson, John A.; Surgery, School of MedicineIntroduction Transplantation of pancreas allografts procured from donation after circulatory death (DCD) remains uncommon. This study reviews a series of pancreas transplants at a single center to assess the donor and recipient characteristics for DCD pancreas transplant and to compare clinical outcomes. Methods DCD procurement was performed with a 5-minute wait time from pronouncement of death to first incision. In 2 patients, tissue plasminogen activator was infused as a thrombolytic during the donor flush. All kidney grafts were placed on pulsatile perfusion. Results There were 606 deceased donor pancreas transplants, 596 standard donors and 10 DCD donors. Of the 10 DCD transplants, 6 were simultaneous pancreas-kidney and 4 were pancreas transplant alone. The average time from incision to aortic cannulation was less than 3 minutes. The median total ischemia time for the DCD grafts was 5.4 hours, compared with 8.0 hours for standard donors (P = .15). Median length of hospital stay was 7 days for both groups, and there were no episode of acute cellular rejection in the first year post-transplant for the DCD group (4.2 % for standard group, P = .65). There was no difference in early or late graft survival, with 100% graft survival in the DCD group up to 1 year post-transplant. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier analysis shows similar graft survival for the 2 groups (P = .92). Conclusions These results support the routine use of carefully selected DCD pancreas donors. There were no differences in graft function, postoperative complications, and early and late graft survival.Item Dueling with the dual artery blood supply in pancreas transplantation: why replace the Y?(AME, 2024) Fridell, Jonathan A.; Stratta, Robert J.; Surgery, School of MedicineItem Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infections in Pancreas Transplant in the Absence of Postoperative Antifungal Prophylaxis(Oxford University Press, 2023-09-26) Zachary, Jessica; Chen, Jeanne M.; Sharfuddin, Asif; Yaqub, Muhammad; Lutz, Andrew; Powelson, John; Fridell, Jonathan A.; Barros, Nicolas; Medicine, School of MedicineBackground: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain a rare yet dreaded complication following pancreas transplantation. Current guidelines recommend antifungal prophylaxis in patients with 1 or more risk factors. At our center, single-dose antifungal prophylaxis is administered in the operating room but none subsequently, regardless of risk factors. Here we evaluate the 1-year incidence, outcome, and risk factors associated with IFI following pancreas transplantation. Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent pancreas transplantation between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019. Records were manually reviewed, and cases were adjudicated using consensus definitions. The 1-year cumulative incidence, mortality, and risk factors were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and differences between populations were assessed with Fisher test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Three hundred sixty-nine recipients were included. Twelve IFIs were identified: candidiasis (8), aspergillosis (2), histoplasmosis (1), and cryptococcosis (1). Intra-abdominal infections were the most common presentation (5), followed by bloodstream infections (3), disseminated disease (2), pulmonary disease (1), and invasive fungal sinusitis (1). Median time to IFI was 64 days (interquartile range, 30-234 days). One-year cumulative incidence was 3.25% (95% confidence interval, 1.86%-5.65%). There were no significant differences between patients with or without IFI regarding type of transplant (P = .17), posttransplant dialysis (P = .3), rejection (P = .5), cytomegalovirus serostatus (P = .45), or reoperation (P = .19). For patients with IFI, the 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 58% versus 95% (P < .0001) and 75% versus 98.6% (P < .001), respectively. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the use of a single-dose antifungal prophylaxis administered in the operating room but none subsequently does not result in an increased incidence of IFI following pancreas transplantation.