Browsing by Author "Browne, Michael G."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The human preference for symmetric walking often disappears when one leg is constrained
    (The Physiological Society, 2021) Browne, Michael G.; Smock, Cameron S.; Roemmich, Ryan T.; Medicine, School of Medicine
    We hypothesized that minimization of metabolic power could drive people to walk asymmetrically when one leg is constrained We studied healthy young adults and independently constrained one or both step lengths to be markedly shorter or longer than preferred using visual feedback When one leg was constrained to take a shorter or longer step than preferred, asymmetric walking patterns were less metabolically costly than symmetric walking patterns When one leg was constrained to take a shorter or longer step than preferred and the other leg was allowed to move freely, most participants naturally adopted an asymmetric gait People may prefer to walk asymmetrically to minimize metabolic power when the function of one leg is constrained during fixed-speed treadmill walking ABSTRACT: The bilateral symmetry inherent in healthy human walking is often disrupted in clinical conditions that primarily affect one leg (e.g. stroke). This seems intuitive: with one leg constrained, gait becomes asymmetric. However, the emergence of asymmetry is not inevitable. Consider that symmetric walking could be preserved by matching the movement of the unconstrained leg to that of the constrained leg. While this is theoretically possible, it is rarely observed in clinical populations. Here, we hypothesized that minimization of metabolic power could drive people to walk asymmetrically when one leg is constrained, even when symmetric walking remains possible. We tested this hypothesis by performing two experiments in healthy adults. In Experiment 1, we constrained one step to be markedly shorter or longer than preferred. We observed that participants could significantly reduce metabolic power by adopting an asymmetric gait (one short/long step, one preferred step) rather than maintaining a symmetric gait (bilateral short/long steps). Indeed, when allowed to walk freely in this situation, participants naturally adopted a less effortful asymmetric gait. In Experiment 2, we applied a milder constraint that more closely approximated magnitudes of step length asymmetry that are observed in clinical populations. Responses in this experiment were more heterogeneous, though most participants adopted an asymmetric gait. These findings support two central conclusions: (1) symmetry is not necessarily energetically optimal in constrained human walking, and (2) people may prefer to walk asymmetrically to minimize metabolic power when one leg is constrained during fixed-speed treadmill walking, especially when the constraint is large.