Browsing by Author "Bartlett, Gregory K."

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analysis of Virtual Versus In-Person Prospective Peer Review Workflow in a Multisite Academic Radiation Oncology Department
    (Elsevier, 2021-11) McClelland, Shearwood III; Amy Achiko, Flora; Bartlett, Gregory K.; Watson, Gordon A.; Holmes, Jordan A.; Rhome, Ryan M.; DesRosiers, Colleen M.; Hutchins, Karen M.; Shiue, Kevin; Agrawal, Namita; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Purpose In radiation oncology, peer review is a process where subjective treatment planning decisions are assessed by those independent of the prescribing physician. Before March 2020, all peer review sessions occurred in person; however due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the peer-review workflow was transitioned from in-person to virtual. We sought to assess any differences between virtual versus in-person prospective peer review. Methods and Materials Patients scheduled to receive nonemergent nonprocedural radiation therapy (RT) were presented daily at prospective peer-review before the start of RT administration. Planning software was used, with critical evaluation of several variables including treatment intent, contour definition, treatment target coverage, and risk to critical structures. A deviation was defined as any suggested plan revision. Results In the study, 274 treatment plans evaluated in-person in 2017 to 2018 were compared with 195 plans evaluated virtually in 2021. There were significant differences in palliative intent (36% vs 22%; P = .002), but not in total time between simulation and the start of treatment (9.2 vs 10.0 days; P = .10). Overall deviations (8.0% in-person vs 2.6% virtual; P = .015) were significantly reduced in virtual peer review. Conclusions Prospective daily peer review of radiation oncology treatment plans can be performed virtually with similar timeliness of patient care compared with in-person peer review. A decrease in deviation rate in the virtual peer review setting will need to be further investigated to determine whether virtual workflow can be considered a standard of care.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Baseline Karnofsky performance status is independently predictive of death within 30 days of intracranial radiation therapy completion for metastatic disease
    (Elsevier, 2020) McClelland, Shearwood, III.; Agrawal, Namita; Elbanna, May F.; Shiue, Kevin; Bartlett, Gregory K.; Lautenschlaeger, Tim; Zellars, Richard C.; Watson, Gordon A.; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Introduction: For patients with brain metastases, palliative radiation therapy (RT) has long been a standard of care for improving quality of life and optimizing intracranial disease control. The duration of time between completion of palliative RT and patient death has rarely been evaluated. Methods: A compilation of two prospective institutional databases encompassing April 2015 through December 2018 was used to identify patients who received palliative intracranial radiation therapy. A multivariate logistic regression model characterized patients adjusting for age, sex, admission status (inpatient versus outpatient), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and radiation therapy indication. Results: 136 consecutive patients received intracranial palliative radiation therapy. Patients with baseline KPS <70 (OR = 2.2; 95%CI = 1.6-3.1; p < 0.0001) were significantly more likely to die within 30 days of treatment. Intracranial palliative radiation therapy was most commonly delivered to provide local control (66% of patients) or alleviate neurologic symptoms (32% of patients), and was most commonly delivered via whole brain radiation therapy in 10 fractions to 30 Gy (38% of patients). Of the 42 patients who died within 30 days of RT, 31 (74%) received at least 10 fractions. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that baseline KPS <70 is independently predictive of death within 30 days of palliative intracranial RT, and that a large majority of patients who died within 30 days received at least 10 fractions. These results indicate that for poor performance status patients requiring palliative intracranial radiation, hypofractionated RT courses should be strongly considered.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Techniques: Brachytherapy, Intensity- Modulated Radiation Therapy, and Proton Beam in Partial Breast Irradiation
    (2015) Hansen, Tara M.; Bartlett, Gregory K.; Mannina, Edward M. Jr.; Srivastava, Shiv P.; Cox, John A.; Das, Indra J.; Department of Radiation Oncology, IU School of Medicine
    Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison of 3 accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques: catheter-based brachytherapy (BT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and proton beam therapy (PBT). Patients and Methods: Twelve patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with SAVI (Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant) were selected in this study. The original BT plans were compared with optimum plans using IMRT and PBT for 34 Gy (RBE) with 1.1 RBE in 10 fractions using identical parameters for target and organs at risk. Results: Significant reduction in maximum dose to the ipsilateral breast was observed with PBT and IMRT (mean 108.58% [PBT] versus 107.78% [IMRT] versus 2194.43% [BT], P = .001 for both PBT and IMRT compared to BT). The mean dose to the heart was 0%, 1.38%, and 3.85%, for PBT, IMRT, and BT, respectively (P < .001 and P = .026). The chest wall mean dose was 10.07%, 14.65%, and 29.44% for PBT, IMRT, and BT, respectively (P = .001 and .013 compared to BT). The PBT was superior in reducing the mean ipsilateral lung dose (mean 0.04% versus 2.13% versus 5.4%, P = .025 and P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the maximum dose to the ipsilateral lung, chest wall, 3-mm skin rind or in the mean ipsilateral breast V50% among the 3 techniques (P = .168, .405, .067, and .780, respectively). PBT exhibited the greatest mean dose homogeneity index of 4.75 compared to 7.18 for IMRT (P = .001) and 195.82 for BT (P < .001). All techniques resulted in similar dose conformality (P = .143). Conclusion: This study confirms the dosimetric feasibility of PBT and IMRT to lower dose to organs at risk while still maintaining high target dose conformality. Though the results of this comparison are promising, continued clinical research is needed to better define the role of PBT and IMRT in the accelerated partial breast irradiation treatment of early-stage breast cancer.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Nearly Half of Metastatic Brain Disease Patients Prescribed 10 Fractions of Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy Die Without Completing Treatment
    (Elsevier, 2019) McClelland, Shearwood, III; Agrawal, Namita; Shiue, Kevin; Bartlett, Gregory K.; Zellars, Richard C.; Watson, Gordon A.; Ellsworth, Susannah G.; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    VMAT partial arc technique decreases dose to organs at risk in whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer when compared to full arc VMAT and IMRT
    (Elsevier, 2023-03) Bartlett, Gregory K.; Njeh, Christopher F.; Huang, Ke C.; DesRosiers, Colleen; Guo, Gordon; Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine
    Whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) can sterilize microscopic lymph node metastases in treatment of prostate cancer. WPRT, compared to prostate only radiotherapy (PORT), is associated with increased acute gastrointestinal, and hematological toxicities. To further explore minimizing normal tissue toxicities associated with WPRT in definitive IMRT for prostate cancer, this planning study compared dosimetric differences between static 9-field-IMRT, full arc VMAT, and mixed partial-full arc VMAT techniques. In this retrospective study, 12 prostate cancer patients who met the criteria for WPRT were randomly selected for this study. The initial volume, PTV46, included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic nodes with margin and was prescribed to 4600 cGy. The cone-down volume, PTV78, included the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles with margin to a total dose of 7800 cGy. For each CT image set, 3 plans were generated for each of the PTVs: an IMRT plan, a full arc (FA) VMAT plan, and a mixed partial-full arc (PFA) VMAT plan, using 6MV photons energy. According to RTOG protocols none of the plans had a major Conformity Index (CI) violation by any of the 3 planning techniques. PFA plan had the best mean CI index of 1.00 and significantly better than IMRT ( p = 0.03) and FA ( p = 0.007). For equivalent PTV coverage, the average composite gradient index of the PFA plans was better than the IMRT and the FA plans with values 1.92, 2.03, and 2.01 respectively. The difference was statistically significant between PFA/IMRT and PFA/FA, with p - values of < 0.001. The IMRT plans and the PFA plans provided very similar doses to the rectum, bladder, sigmoid colon, and femoral heads, which were lower than the dose in the FA plans. There was a significant decrease in the mean dose to the rectum from 4524 cGy with the FA to 4182 cGy with the PFA and 4091 cGy with IMRT ( p < 0.001). The percent of rectum receiving 4000 cGy was also the highest with FA at 66.1% compared to 49.9% (PFA) and 47.5% (IMRT). There was a significant decrease in the mean dose to the bladder from 3922 cGy (FA) to 3551 cGy (PFA) and 3612 cGy (IMRT) ( p < 0.001). The percent of bladder receiving 4000 cGy was also the highest with FA at 45.4% compared to 36.6% (PFA) and 37.4% (IMRT). The average mean dose to the sigmoid colon decreased from 4177 cGy (FA) to 3893 cGy (PFA) and 3819 cGy (IMRT). The average mean dose to the femoral heads decreased from 2091 cGy (FA) to 2026 cGy (PFA) and 1987 cGy (IMRT). Considering the improvement in plan quality indices recorded in this study including the dose gradient and the dose to organs at risk, mixed partial-full arc plans may be the preferred VMAT treatment technique over full arc plans for prostate cancer treatments that include nodal volumes.