Ethanol consumption in mice: relationships with circadian period and entrainment

dc.contributor.authorTrujillo, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorDo, David T.
dc.contributor.authorGrahame, Nicholas J.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Amanda J.
dc.contributor.authorGorman, Michael R.
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology, School of Scienceen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-24T15:16:53Z
dc.date.available2016-10-24T15:16:53Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.description.abstractA functional connection between the circadian timing system and alcohol consumption is suggested by multiple lines of converging evidence. Ethanol consumption perturbs physiological rhythms in hormone secretion, sleep and body temperature, and conversely, genetic and environmental perturbations of the circadian system can alter alcohol intake. A fundamental property of the circadian pacemaker, the endogenous period of its cycle under free-running conditions, was previously shown to differ between selectively bred High- (HAP) and Low- (LAP) Alcohol Preferring replicate 1 mice. To test whether there is a causal relationship between circadian period and ethanol intake, we induced experimental, rather than genetic, variations in free-running period. Male inbred C57Bl/6J mice and replicate 2 male and female HAP2 and LAP2 mice were entrained to light:dark cycles of 26 h or 22 h or remained in a standard 24 h cycle. Upon discontinuation of the light:dark cycle, experimental animals exhibited longer and shorter free-running periods, respectively. Despite robust effects on circadian period and clear circadian rhythms in drinking, these manipulations failed to alter the daily ethanol intake of the inbred strain or selected lines. Likewise, driving the circadian system at long and short periods produced no change in alcohol intake. In contrast with replicate 1 HAP and LAP lines, there was no difference in free-running period between ethanol naïve HAP2 and LAP2 mice. HAP2 mice, however, were significantly more active than LAP2 mice as measured by general home-cage movement and wheel running, a motivated behavior implicating a selection effect on reward systems. Despite a marked circadian regulation of drinking behavior, the free-running and entrained period of the circadian clock does not determine daily ethanol intake.en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationTrujillo JL, Do DT, Grahame NJ, Roberts AJ, Gorman MR. Ethanol consumption in mice: relationships with circadian period and entrainment. Alcohol (Fayetteville, NY). 2011;45(2):147-159. doi:10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.08.016.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11230
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.alcohol.2010.08.016en_US
dc.relation.journalAlcoholen_US
dc.rightsPublisher Policyen_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.subjectCircadianen_US
dc.subjectEntrainmenten_US
dc.subjectAlcoholen_US
dc.subjectTauen_US
dc.subjectC57 miceen_US
dc.subjectAlcohol preferring miceen_US
dc.titleEthanol consumption in mice: relationships with circadian period and entrainmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
nihms233064.pdf
Size:
3.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: