Legislative Framework for Reducing Fraud in the Credit Repair Industry

Date
1992
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Can't use the file because of accessibility barriers? Contact us with the title of the item, permanent link, and specifics of your accommodation need.
Abstract

Large computer databases collect and distribute information about the creditworthiness of most American adults. Businesses use this data to gauge the solvency of potential customers. Yet the information in these vast computer files is often partly or wholly inaccurate. Incorrect entries in his credit file may render a consumer unable to obtain credit until such information is deleted. Removing this data is often difficult and costly. In recent years a new industry has arisen to assist consumers in their efforts to correct inaccuracies in their files. Companies, in exchange for a fee, promise to improve a person's credit rating by challenging negative information that appears on her credit report. Unfortunately, instances of poor service and fraud in the credit repair industry are widespread, causing a rising tide of consumer complaints. As a result, several states have sought to regulate the activities of credit repair organizations, but with limited success. In this Article Professor Nehf claims that credit repair organizations have flourished because the Fair Credit Reporting Act makes it difficult for consumers to remove mistakes from their credit reports without outside assistance. He argues that in- stances of fraud would be greatly reduced if Congress would simply amend the Act to require better disclosure and simplify the labor that consumers must undertake to investigate and remove errors. Such a revision would reduce the need for consumers to seek assistance from credit repair organizations. Professor Nehf also argues that federal regulation of the credit repair industry is needed to combat widespread fraud; he then analyzes current state statutes regulating credit repair organizations in order to provide a legislative framework for reform.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
70 North Carolina Law Review 781
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Article
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}