Survival Analysis of Endodontically Treated Teeth in Patients with Diabetes and Hypertension within National Dental PBRN Practices

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is rapidly increasing among the aging United States population. This poses a challenge to dental providers since DM and multiple oral conditions have been identified as comorbidities. Hypertension (HTN) is associated with more poorly controlled DM and has been identified as contributing to RCT tooth loss in prior studies. Links have also been established between DM and the survival rate of root canal treated teeth, however, previous research has focused on institutional settings despite the majority of RCT being performed in private dental practices. This study will use data from private dental practices to evaluate the survival rate of RCT teeth in patients with DM and HTN. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated the survival rate of endodontic treated teeth among patients with DM and HTN using National Dental PBRN Practice data. Electronic dental records from 42 private dental practices in the United States over a period of 15 years with a minimum 2-year follow-up comprising 11,532 root canal treated teeth were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to demonstrate the effects of HTN and DM on RCT tooth survival and Cox proportional hazards survival analysis was used to evaluate the DM and HTN effects after accounting for age, gender, insurance, year of treatment, tooth type, and crown and filling placement as covariates. Results: Patients with HTN only had significantly lower risk of failure than patients with both HTN and DM (p=0.003). Patients with neither HTN nor DM had significantly lower risk of failure than patients with both HTN and DM (p=0.020). Patients with DM only did not have significantly different risk of failure than patients with both HTN and DM (p=0.223). Patients with DM only did not have significantly different risk of failure than patients with HTN only (p=0.361). Patients with neither HTN nor DM did not have significantly different risk of failure than patients with HTN only (p=0.121) or patients with DM only (p=0.800). Conclusions: Patients with both DM and HTN have an increased chance of root canal treated tooth failure while patients with only DM or only HTN do not. Evaluation of severity of DM may be more important in determining RCT failure and studies utilizing laboratory values should be considered for future research.