Peer Collaborative Clinical Decision-Making in Virtual Reality Nursing Simulation

dc.contributor.advisorReising, Deanna L.
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Thye Peng
dc.contributor.otherDraucker, Claire Burke
dc.contributor.otherBarnes, Roxie
dc.contributor.otherKwon, Kyungbin
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T18:52:40Z
dc.date.available2023-05-23T18:52:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-05
dc.degree.date2023en_US
dc.degree.discipline
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelPh.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractIn nursing education, it is common for students to collaborate and make decisions as a group in simulations. One of the vital nursing competencies is students’ ability to make sound clinical judgments and decision-making in simulation. Teamwork among students in simulation significantly affects their critical thinking and clinical reasoning. However, how students collaborate and make decisions in simulation is a complex phenomenon and not well studied and understood. In addition, most existing decision-making frameworks, such as Tanner’s Clinical Judgment Model and the National Council of State Boards of Nursing’s Clinical Judgment Measurement Model, focus solely on individual decision-making. Alternatively, teamwork and collaboration frameworks, such as TeamSTEPPS®, emphasize interprofessional collaboration rather than intraprofessional or peer-to-peer collaboration. Furthermore, peer collaboration and decision-making cannot be accurately measured without a theoretical framework. Because clinical decision-making in nursing practice is a complex process that involves peer collaboration, more research is needed to explore how nursing students collaborate and make decisions in simulation. This qualitative study comprises of a hybrid concept analysis and Charmaz’s constructivist grounded theory to explore prelicensure nursing student’s peer collaborative clinical decision-making (PCCDM). The concept analysis develops a comprehensive definition of PCCDM based on theoretical and empirical data. The grounded theory develops the theoretical framework that captures the process of PCCDM, which consists of the three major domains of group cognition, behavior, and emotion. These domains undergo the peer regulatory process of awareness, communication, and regulation within the individual and collaborative space at various simulation phases. Additionally, a thematic analysis further explores group emotion in PCCDM as the domain is the least studied in nursing simulation. This study provides the framework to support healthcare and nursing simulation involving peer collaboration and decision-making.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/33195
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/3143
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectClinical decision-makingen_US
dc.subjectNursing educationen_US
dc.subjectNursing simulationen_US
dc.subjectPeer collaborationen_US
dc.subjectVirtual reality simulationen_US
dc.titlePeer Collaborative Clinical Decision-Making in Virtual Reality Nursing Simulationen_US
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ngo_iupui_0104D_10674.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: