An in-vitro study evaluating the efficacy of the ultrasonic bypass system™, using different intracanal irrigating solutions

dc.contributor.advisorVail, Mychel Macapagal, 1969-
dc.contributor.authorBarney, Jason Phillip, 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherSpolnik, Kenneth Jacob, 1950-
dc.contributor.otherZunt, Susan L., 1951-
dc.contributor.otherLegan, Joseph J.
dc.contributor.otherMoore, B. Keith
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-28T17:51:11Zen_US
dc.date.available2010-07-28T17:51:11Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.degree.date2010en_US
dc.degree.disciplineSchool of Dentistryen_US
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.S.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis in-vitro, prospective, randomized study microscopically compared the debridement efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) using the Ultrasonic Bypass System and different irrigating protocols. Eighty extracted maxillary anterior teeth were randomly assigned to four groups. Teeth were instrumented using EndoSequence rotary instrument system and treated with passive ultrasonic irrigation with different irrigating regimens for one minute. Group one (control) was treated with hand/rotary instrumentation. Group two was treated with hand/rotary instrumentation followed by a one-minute PUI using the Ultrasonic Bypass System with 6.0-percent NaOCl. Group three was treated with hand/rotary instrumentation followed by a one-minute PUI using the Ultrasonic Bypass System with 17-percent EDTA. Group four was treated with hand/rotary instrumentation followed by a one-minute PUI using the Ultrasonic Bypass System with 30 seconds of 6.0-percent NaOCl and 30 seconds of 17-percent EDTA. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally and each half was divided into three equal parts from the anatomic apex. The half with the most visible part of the apex was used for SEM evaluation. A scoring system for debris and smear layer removal was used. Statistical analysis was performed using a Kruskal-Wallis test, which determines if there are any differences among the four groups. Following this test, a Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare each pair of groups. The addition of a one-minute PUI with the Ultrasonic Bypass System significantly enhanced the removal of smear layer when compared with the hand/rotary instrumentation with conventional irrigating solutions. The Ultrasonic Bypass System when used with the combination of 6.0-percent NaOCl and 17-percent EDTA after hand/rotary instrumentation significantly removed smear layer at the coronal, middle, and apical areas of a tooth when compared with all other groups. A one-minute PUI with the Ultrasonic Bypass System combined with NaOCl and EDTA is significantly better in smear removal and ultimately will result cleaner canal wall.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/2225en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1446
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectIrrigating Solutionsen_US
dc.subjectRoot Canalen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonicsen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic Bypass Systemen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Cavity Preparation -- methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshUltrasonic Therapyen_US
dc.subject.meshDebridement -- methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshIrrigation -- methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshEdetic Acid -- therapeutic useen_US
dc.subject.meshSodium Hypochlorite -- therapeutic useen_US
dc.subject.meshSmear Layeren_US
dc.subject.meshRoot Canal Therapy -- methodsen_US
dc.titleAn in-vitro study evaluating the efficacy of the ultrasonic bypass system™, using different intracanal irrigating solutionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FinalDraftof Jason Barney.pdf
Size:
51.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final Draft
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: