Evaluation of water sorption and solubility behavior of nine different polymeric luting materials

dc.contributor.advisorPlatt, Jeffrey A.
dc.contributor.authorAlsheikh, Rasha N.
dc.contributor.otherLund, Melvin R., 1922-
dc.contributor.otherCochran, Michael A. (Michael Alan), 1944-
dc.contributor.otherMoore, B. Keith
dc.contributor.otherMatis, Bruce A.
dc.date2009en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-04T19:26:04Z
dc.date.available2010-02-04T19:26:04Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.degree.date2009
dc.degree.disciplineSchool of Dentistryen_US
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.S.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe cementation procedure is the key to long-term success of fixed restorations. The prognosis of prosthetic restoration is largely impacted by the maintenance of the luting cement and the adhesive bond. When exposed to water or saliva, most restorative materials undergo hydrolytic degradation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the water solubility and water sorption characteristics of newly introduced acidic polymeric luting agents over a 180-day water-storage period. Nine different luting agents were tested. Fifty-two disc specimens of each material were fabricated using a mold with an internal dimension of 15[plus-minus]0.1 mm in diameter and 1.0 [plus-minus]0.1 mm deep. A constant weight, W0 [subscript zero], was reached after desiccating the specimens. Then, 13 specimens were assigned randomly to one of the four testing periods in the water for seven, 30, 90 and 180 days. After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1 [subscript one]. A second period of desiccating the samples provided a constant weight W2 [subscript two]. The water sorption and solubility were determined by the following equations: WSP [subscript SP](%) = (W1 [subscript one] W2 [subscript two] ) X 100/ W0 [subscript zero] ,WSL [subscript SL](%) = (W0 [subscript zero] W2 [subscript two) X 100/ W0 [subscript zero]. The resin-modified glass-ionomers showed the highest water sorption/solubility results. The resin luting agents had the lowest sorption/solubility results. The self-adhesives showed a wide range of solubility/sorption; in general, they showed lower results compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers. All the materials reached some sort of equilibrium after 90-days. Based on the results of our study, we conclude that self-adhesive luting materials were not all alike. Rely X Unicem was the most comparable to the resin luting materials. The resin luting materials had the lowest solubility and sorption. Resin-modified glass-ionomers showed the highest sorption/solubility results.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/2081
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1456
dc.subjectluting agenten_US
dc.subjectself adhesive luting agentsen_US
dc.subjectsolubilityen_US
dc.subjectwater sorptionen_US
dc.subject.meshSolubililtyen_US
dc.subject.meshWateren_US
dc.subject.meshAbsorptionen_US
dc.subject.meshResin Cementsen_US
dc.subject.meshPolymersen_US
dc.subject.meshGlass Ionomer Cementsen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of water sorption and solubility behavior of nine different polymeric luting materialsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
final_CURRICULUM_VITAE[1][1].pdf
Size:
26.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Curriculum Vitae
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Final_intro_pages_for_Dr._Al-Sheikh[1].pdf
Size:
47.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Introduction
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
THE final_thesis_after_eclusion[1][1].pdf
Size:
911.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: