Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorHsia, Renee Y
dc.contributor.authorAkosa Antwi, Yaa
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Ellerie
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-06T15:30:05Z
dc.date.available2014-03-06T15:30:05Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.descriptionThis is the publisher's version. To view the original publication, see http://bmjopen.bmj.comen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article aims to examine the between-hospital variation of charges and discounted prices for uncomplicated vaginal and caesarean section deliveries, and to determine the institutional and market-level characteristics that influence adjusted charges. Using data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), we conducted a cross-sectional study of all privately insured patients admitted to California hospitals in 2011 for uncomplicated vaginal delivery (diagnosis-related group (DRG) 775) or uncomplicated caesarean section (DRG 766). Hospital charges and discounted prices were adjusted for each patient's clinical and demographic characteristics. We analysed 76,766 vaginal deliveries and 32,660 caesarean sections in California in 2011. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, we found that the average California woman could be charged as little as US$3,296 or as much as US$37,227 for a vaginal delivery and US$8,312–US$70,908 for a caesarean section depending on which hospital she was admitted to. The discounted prices were, on an average, 37% of the charges. We found that hospitals in markets with middling competition had significantly lower adjusted charges for vaginal deliveries, while hospitals with higher wage indices and casemixes, as well as for-profit hospitals, had higher adjusted charges. Hospitals in markets with higher uninsurance rates charged significantly less for caesarean sections, while for-profit hospitals and hospitals with higher wage indices charged more. However, the institutional and market-level factors included in our models explained only 35–36% of the between-hospital variation in charges. These results indicate that charges and discounted prices for two common, relatively homogeneous diagnosis groups—uncomplicated vaginal delivery and caesarean section—vary widely between hospitals and are not well explained by observable patient or hospital characteristics.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHsia, RY, Akosa Antwi, Y, & Weber, E. (2014). Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, (4)1, e004017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/4076
dc.titleAnalysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
akosa-antwi-2014-analysis-of.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections