The Legal Causes of Dissolution of Company: A Comparative Study Between Saudi Law, Islamic Law, and Delaware Law

If you need an accessible version of this item, please email your request to digschol@iu.edu so that they may create one and provide it to you.
Date
2015-11
Language
American English
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Chair
Committee Members
Degree
S.J.D.
Degree Year
2015
Department
Robert H. McKinney School of Law
Grantor
Indiana University
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract

The objectives of this dissertation are to examine Saudi Arabian company dissolution regulation, by answering the following questions: Is Saudi Arabia dissolution regulation consistent with Islamic Law? Is Islamic dissolution law inconsistent with modern law, such as Delaware law? Should Saudi Arabia dissolution regulation be made consistent with modern law, such as Delaware law? My answers are that Saudi Arabia dissolution regulation is consistent with Islamic Law; Islamic dissolution law has broad general rules that are consistent with modern law; and Saudi Law is old and needs to be modernized. In order to improve Saudi Arabia's dissolution regulation, I propose a new regime that is consistent with Islamic dissolution law and modern standards, such as Delaware law, My proposed regime aims to give maximum consideration to contractual flexibility, clarify ambiguousness, protect the law, support the existence of a company, protect a company's creditors and the transferees of an owner's economic interest, protect owners' interests, protect company's interests, and protect minority stakes.

Description
item.page.description.tableofcontents
item.page.relation.haspart
Cite As
ISSN
Publisher
Series/Report
Sponsorship
Major
Extent
Identifier
Relation
Journal
Source
Alternative Title
Type
Dissertation
Number
Volume
Conference Dates
Conference Host
Conference Location
Conference Name
Conference Panel
Conference Secretariat Location
Version
Full Text Available at
This item is under embargo {{howLong}}