Perspectives of Internal Medicine Residency Program Directors on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Diversity Standards

dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Strengel, Angela
dc.contributor.authorBalasuriya, Lilanthi
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Aba
dc.contributor.authorBerg, David
dc.contributor.authorGenao, Inginia
dc.contributor.authorGross, Cary P.
dc.contributor.authorKeene, Danya
dc.contributor.authorLatimore, Darin
dc.contributor.authorSotto-Santiago, Sylk
dc.contributor.authorBoatright, Dowin
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T20:31:04Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T20:31:04Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground: To increase diversity and inclusion in graduate medical education, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) issued a revision to their Common Program Requirements during the 2019–2020 academic year mandating that all residency programs must have policies and practices to achieve appropriate diversity among trainees and faculty. Objective: To explore the perspectives of internal medicine program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) on the ACGME diversity standard. Design: Qualitative study of internal medicine residency program leadership from academic and community programs across the USA. Participants: Current PDs (n = 12) and APDs (n = 8) of accredited US internal medicine residency programs. Approach: We conducted semi-structured, in-depth qualitative interviews. Data was analyzed using the constant comparative method to extract recurrent themes. Key Results: Three main themes, described by participants, were identified: (1) internal medicine PDs and APDs had limited knowledge of the new Common Program Requirement relating to diversity; (2) program leaders expressed concern that the diversity standard reaches beyond the PDs’ scope of influence and lack of institutional commitment to the successful implementation of diversity standards; (3) participants described narrow view of diversity and inclusion efforts focusing on recruitment strategies during the interview season. Conclusions: Our findings of lack of familiarity with the new diversity standards, and limited institutional investment in diversity and inclusion efforts raise a concern about successful implementation across GME programs. Nevertheless, our finding suggests that structured implementation in the form of education, guideposts, and financial allocation can alleviate some of the concerns of program leadership in meeting the new ACGME diversity standard in a meaningful way.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMartinez-Strengel A, Balasuriya L, Black A, et al. Perspectives of Internal Medicine Residency Program Directors on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Diversity Standards. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(9):2539-2546. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06825-2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32497
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11606-021-06825-2en_US
dc.subjectWorkforce diversityen_US
dc.subjectGraduate medical educationen_US
dc.subjectDiversity accreditation standardsen_US
dc.titlePerspectives of Internal Medicine Residency Program Directors on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Diversity Standardsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ul.alternative.fulltexthttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8390633/
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Martinez-Strengel2021Perspectives-PMC.pdf
Size:
308.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: