Examining the relationship between clinical judgment and nursing action in baccalaureate nursing students

dc.contributor.advisorDreifuerst, Kristina Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFedko, Andrea Lauren
dc.contributor.otherIronside, Pamela M.
dc.contributor.otherReising, Deanna
dc.contributor.otherWonder, Amy Hagedorn
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T17:02:10Z
dc.date.available2017-01-10T17:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-29
dc.degree.date2016en_US
dc.degree.disciplineSchool of Nursing
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelPh.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractClinical judgment provides the basis for nurses’ actions and is essential for the provision of safe nursing care. Tanner’s Clinical Judgment Model and its associated instrument, the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) have been used in the discipline of nursing, yet it is unclear if scores on the rubric actually translate to the completion of an indicated nursing action. This is important because clinical judgment involves identifying and responding to patient situations through nursing action, and then evaluation of such actions. The purpose of this observational study was to explore the relationship between clinical judgment, as measured by the LCJR, and the completion of an indicated nursing action, as measured by a nursing action form. The clinical judgment and completion of an indicated nursing action was measured in 92 participant students at a Midwestern university school of nursing who were enrolled in an adult medical/surgical nursing course that included simulation and debriefing during which scoring occurred. This study explored whether clinical judgment, as measured by the LCJR, was related to the completion of an indicated nursing action. In addition, this study evaluated whether Responding, as measured by the LCJR was related to the completion of an indicated nursing action. The data revealed that a very weak relationship was present between clinical judgment, as measured by the LCJR, and the completion of an indicated nursing action; however, these findings were not statistically significant. The data also revealed that a very weak relationship was present between the dimension Responding, and the completion of an indicated nursing action; however, these findings were also not statistically significant. This study expands upon previous clinical judgment research in nursing and identifies a need for additional methods of evaluating clinical judgment in baccalaureate nursing students including action appraisal so that deficiencies are established and targeted for improvement.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7912/C2989D
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11775
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1293
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBaccalaureate nursing educationen_US
dc.subjectClinical judgmenten_US
dc.titleExamining the relationship between clinical judgment and nursing action in baccalaureate nursing studentsen_US
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fedko_iupui_0104D_10155.pdf
Size:
1.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: