Of Disunity and Logrolling: Ohio's One-Subject Rule and the Very Evils it was Designed to Prevent

dc.contributor.authorHoffer, Stephanie R.
dc.contributor.authorMcDade, Travis
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T19:16:29Z
dc.date.available2021-02-03T19:16:29Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.description.abstractThis article looks at the one-subject rule's history and significant jurisprudence with particular note of any rules that can be determined. Next, we address the court's use of the rule in the controversial case of State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward' Finally, we look at Amended Substitute Senate Bill No. 281-recently passed by the Ohio General Assembly-to determine if it will pass one-subject muster under recent jurisprudence.en_US
dc.identifier.citation51 Cleveland State Law Review 557en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/25140
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleOf Disunity and Logrolling: Ohio's One-Subject Rule and the Very Evils it was Designed to Preventen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Of Disunity and Logrolling Ohios One Subject Rule and the Very Evils it was Designed to Prevent.pdf
Size:
3.42 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: