Bought But Not Sold Out: A Critical Autoethnography of a Public School Board Member in the Neoliberal Turn

dc.contributor.advisorScheurich, Jim
dc.contributor.authorCosby, Gayle S.
dc.contributor.otherMedina, Monica
dc.contributor.otherRogan, Patricia
dc.contributor.otherEtienne, Leslie K.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T15:30:17Z
dc.date.available2022-06-08T15:30:17Z
dc.date.issued2022-05
dc.degree.date2022en_US
dc.degree.disciplineSchool of Education
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelPh.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractNeoliberalism is a pro-capitalist ideology that cycles money and power to the elite class by deregulating or privatizing the public sphere and is fueled by economic exploitation and oppression. This dissertation examines the neoliberal construct at work in the privatization of Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS) from an ethnographic lens using the vantage point of an elected IPS board member. The literature surrounding the privatization of public schools offers stories from all over the U.S., however the conditions surrounding the privatization of public education systems are similar irrespective of geographical location. Common themes across the country include the de-professionalization of teachers, the circulation of the narrative myth of failing public schools and charter schools as a positive alternative, and overarching patterns of continued school segregation, gentrification of inner cities, and racial migratory patterns of residents affecting school enrollment. Theoretical framing employed in this study includes Punctuated Equilibrium at the macro level; sociopolitics and logics of action at the meso level, and critical theory and politics of resistance at the micro level of analysis. The analysis of data was conducted thematically and data sources encompass a self-authored blog as well as personal communications and reflections, news articles, and board documents. Results of this study illustrate that IPS as an organization underwent a fulcrum point of change, or ‘Punctuated Equilibrium’ in which it ceased to be an exclusively public institution and began to establish partnerships with private charter school companies with inherent profit motives, via the ‘Innovation School Network’. There were many political players involved in orchestrating this change, and those interest groups and their logics of action are detailed. Implications of this study include identifying the future spread of school privatization and possibilities for disrupting the furthering of this neoliberal agenda.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/29301
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/2951
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcharter schoolsen_US
dc.subjecteducational privatizationen_US
dc.subjectfor-profit educationen_US
dc.subjectneoliberalismen_US
dc.subjectprivatization of public schoolsen_US
dc.subjectschool boarden_US
dc.titleBought But Not Sold Out: A Critical Autoethnography of a Public School Board Member in the Neoliberal Turnen_US
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cosby_iupui_0104D_10582.pdf
Size:
3.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: