Understanding the Individual Narratives of Women Who Use Formula in Relation to the Master Narrative of "Breast is Best"
dc.contributor.advisor | Bute, Jennifer J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Scott, Susanna Foxworthy | |
dc.contributor.other | Brann, Maria | |
dc.contributor.other | Head, Katharine | |
dc.contributor.other | Turman, Jack E., Jr. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-06T12:50:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-06T12:50:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05 | |
dc.degree.date | 2022 | en_US |
dc.degree.discipline | ||
dc.degree.grantor | Indiana University | en_US |
dc.degree.level | Ph.D. | en_US |
dc.description | Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Despite clinical recommendations, only 25.8% of infants in the United States are exclusively breastfed at 6 months of age. Breastfeeding policies and communication campaigns exist to support exclusive breastfeeding, and women who use formula report facing stigma and feeling like a failure. Narratives can be used to discern how individuals make sense of experiences related to health, and narrative theorizing in health communication provides a framework of problematics used to explain how individuals construct stories that reveal the tensions between continuity and disruption and creativity and constraint. Individual experiences are often influenced by master narratives such as “Breast is best,” which are phrases that shape our understanding of the world. Because of the negative impact of using formula on maternal well-being, the purpose of this research was to use a narrative framework to analyze the stories of women who used formula in relation to the master narrative of breast is best. Building off of pilot interviews with 22 mothers, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 women who had used formula within the first 6 months after giving birth and had an infant no older than 12 months at the time of the interview. Qualitative analysis revealed that women perceived formula as shameful and costly. Conversely, they viewed breastfeeding as biologically superior, better for bonding, and a way to enact good motherhood. Current messaging about breastfeeding, particularly for women who intend to breastfeed, may have unintended negative effects when women face a disruption to their breastfeeding journey. In addition, women viewed breastfeeding and formula feeding as in relation to and in opposition to one another, reducing the perceived acceptability of behaviors such as combination feeding. Despite constraints in the master narrative regarding acceptable infant feeding practices, women demonstrated creativity in their individual stories and found formula feeding enabled more equitable parenting and preserved mental health. Practical implications include that organizations promoting exclusive breastfeeding in the United States should move away from framing breastfeeding as an all-or-nothing choice and develop tailored and value-neutral messaging recognizing breastfeeding as a complex psychosocial and biological process. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/29242 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/2940 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Breastfeeding | en_US |
dc.subject | Breastfeeding promotion | en_US |
dc.subject | Master narrative | en_US |
dc.subject | Maternal health | en_US |
dc.subject | Narrative theory | en_US |
dc.subject | Wellbeing | en_US |
dc.title | Understanding the Individual Narratives of Women Who Use Formula in Relation to the Master Narrative of "Breast is Best" | en_US |
dc.type | Dissertation |