Emergency Department Utilization Among Pediatric and Young Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (2009-2014)

dc.contributor.advisorStone, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorMullen, Cody J.
dc.contributor.otherMenachemi, Nir
dc.contributor.otherMonahan, Patrick
dc.contributor.otherJohnston, Ann
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-13T13:35:19Z
dc.date.available2021-05-08T09:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.degree.date2019en_US
dc.degree.discipline
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelPh.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The prevalence of those aged 3-25 with an intellectual and developmental disability (I/DD), has increased 17.1% from 1997 to 2008. This study focused on these I/DD: autism spectrum disorder (ASD), cerebral palsy, learning disabilities and spina bifida. Previous studies have found that individuals with an I/DD use health services and the emergency department (ED) more frequently, regardless of payer. Methods: This dissertation will describe and define the characteristics of ED use among children and young adults with an I/DD. A repeated, cross-section of annual data of a national sample distributed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Utilization Project National Emergency Department Sample will be analyzed from 2009-2014. This approach will document the primary clinical reason for ED use, the appropriateness of the need for a visit, and demographic, geographic, and temporal correlates for medical, injury, and psychiatric care visits in the ED. The appropriateness of need will be assessed by the New York University (NYU) Emergency Department Diagnosis Classification method for medical care visits. A logistic regression model will be specified for each visit type. Results: The sample included 386,632 visits with an I/DD diagnosis. The NYU classification method found that 44.6% of all visits for ASD were classified as nonemergent yet the other three I/DD had a non-emergent visit rate ranging 25.9%-28.8%. The ASD sub-sample was 51.8% of all visits for psychiatric care and 50.5% of all visits for injury care. All independent variables tested: admission on weekend, ED trauma level, age, sex, payer source, patient zip code income quarterlies, and patient rurality, were found to be statistically different for each model. Conclusion: The findings indicate the need for development of interventions that are specific to reducing non-emergent ED utilization for children and young adults with a diagnosis of ASD and interventions developed for reduction of emergent ED care for the other I/DD’s. In addition, unique interventions are needed to reduce the utilization of the ED for psychiatric care specifically for the ASD population and utilization of the ED for injury care for all I/DD diagnoses.en_US
dc.description.embargo2021-05-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/19247
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/2837
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAutism Spectrum Disorderen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental disabilitiesen_US
dc.subjectEmergency departmenten_US
dc.subjectHealthcare utilizationen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual disabilitiesen_US
dc.titleEmergency Department Utilization Among Pediatric and Young Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (2009-2014)en_US
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mullen_iupui_0104D_10352.pdf
Size:
2.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: