The Consequences of Contemporary Legal Relativism
| dc.contributor.author | Wright, R. George | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-15T20:35:17Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-09-15T20:35:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1990 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This essay will argue both that legal relativism has in fact influenced contemporary Supreme Court constitutional jurisprudence, and that such influence will not tend to be beneficial. The emphasis of this essay will be on the argument that even if relativism cannot be technically refuted as a philosophical doctrine, it offers a number of pragmatic disadvantages, with no compensating advantages. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 22 University of Toledo Law Review 73 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1805/23850 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.title | The Consequences of Contemporary Legal Relativism | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- The Consequences of Contemporary Legal Relativism.pdf
- Size:
- 4.63 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.99 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: