An Assessment of the Fidelity of Two Different Interventions to Improve Adherence to Glaucoma Treatment in Patients of African Descent

dc.contributor.authorIdowu, Eniola
dc.contributor.authorBigatti, Silvia M.
dc.contributor.authorRacette, Lyne
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-05T19:20:43Z
dc.date.available2016-04-05T19:20:43Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-17
dc.descriptionposter abstracten_US
dc.description.abstractGlaucoma is a chronic eye disease, which is asymptomatic and can slowly lead to blindness if left untreated. Glaucoma is caused by damage to the optic nerve and can lead to irreversible loss of sight. The overall objective of this MURI study was to determine the impact of two different interventions on compliance to glaucoma medication in patients of African descent with open-angle glaucoma. Two types of intervention were used – Education and Motivational Interviewing (MI). The educational intervention involved sharing knowledge with patients about glaucoma, its causes, and its treatments, to help patients better understand glaucoma and the importance of adhering to the daily medication regimen. The MI intervention involved communicating with the patients and encouraging them to identify strategies that would help them better adhere to their medications. These sessions were video-recorded and the content of each video was transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were then scored to assess the fidelity of each session with the intervention type that was given; this was done to ensure that each patient in the MI group received intervention consistent with MI, and that each patient in the Education group received an intervention free of MI. The standard Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity 3.0 coding sheet was used to code the MI and Education sessions. Global ratings were given for empathy, direction, collaboration, evocation and autonomy/support on a scale ranging from 1 (Low) to 5 (High). The following behaviors were counted within each transcript: giving information, MI adherent (asking permission, affirm, emphasize control, support), MI Non-adherent (advise, confront, direct), questions (closed questions, open questions), and reflections (simple, complex). We expect that the MI interventions would have significantly higher scores on MI adherent behaviors and significantly lower on MI-non-adherent behaviors compared to the Education session.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEniola Idowu, Silvia Bigatti, and Lyne Racette. 2015 April 17. An Assessment of the Fidelity of Two Different Interventions to Improve Adherence to Glaucoma Treatment in Patients of African Descent. Poster session presented at IUPUI Research Day 2015, Indianapolis, Indiana.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/9181
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOffice of the Vice Chancellor for Researchen_US
dc.subjectGlaucomaen_US
dc.subjectchronic eye diseaseen_US
dc.subjectMURI studyen_US
dc.subjectinterventionsen_US
dc.subjectglaucoma treatmentsen_US
dc.subjectAfrican descenten_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectMotivational Interviewing (MI)en_US
dc.titleAn Assessment of the Fidelity of Two Different Interventions to Improve Adherence to Glaucoma Treatment in Patients of African Descenten_US
dc.typePosteren_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Idowu-Assessment.pdf
Size:
21.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: