Longevity of Crown Margin Repairs Using Glass Ionomer: A Retrospective Study

dc.contributor.advisorCook, N. Blaine
dc.contributor.advisorThyvalikakath, Thankam
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Justin I.
dc.contributor.otherDiefenderfer, Kim E.
dc.contributor.otherCapin, Oriana
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-20T17:22:35Z
dc.date.available2020-04-20T17:22:35Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.degree.date2020en_US
dc.degree.disciplineSchool of Dentistryen
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.S.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Repair of crown margins may extend the functional life of existing crowns. However, the longevity of such treatment is unknown. This study determined the survival time of crown margin repairs (CMR) with glass-ionomer (GI) and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Methods: We queried axiUm (Exan Group, Coquitlam, BC, Canada) database for permanent teeth that underwent CMR in the Graduate Operative Dentistry Clinic, Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD), Indianapolis, Ind., USA, from January 1, 2006 through January 1, 2018. Since there is no CDT code for the CMR procedure, CDT codes for resin-composite and GI restorations (D23XX) were queried; these patients also had treatment notes that indicated CMR. The final data set included patient ID, birth date, gender, dates of treatments, CDT codes, tooth type, tooth surface and existing findings. Two examiners developed guidelines for record review and manually reviewed the clinical notes of patient records to confirm CMR. Only records that were confirmed with the presence of CMR were retained in the final dataset for survival analysis. Survival time was calculated by Kaplan-Meier statistics and a Cox Proportional Hazards model was performed to assess the influence of selected variables (p < 0.05). Results: 214 teeth (115 patients) with CMR were evaluated. Patient average age was 69.4  11.7 years old. Posterior teeth accounted for 78.5 percent (n = 168) of teeth treated. CMRs using GI had a projected 5-year survival rate of 62.9 percent (K-M Analysis) and an 8.9 percent annual failure rate. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression analysis revealed that none of the factors examined (age, gender, tooth type) affected time to failure. Conclusion: CMRs may extend the longevity of crowns with defective margins. Larger EHR studies or case control studies are needed to investigate other variables, such as the caries risk status or the severity of defects that may affect the survival rate of CMRs.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/22605
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1662
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCrown margin repairen_US
dc.subjectRepairen_US
dc.subjectReplaceen_US
dc.subjectRepair longevityen_US
dc.subjectGlass ionomeren_US
dc.subject.meshComposite Resinsen_US
dc.subject.meshCrownsen_US
dc.subject.meshGlass Ionomer Cementsen_US
dc.subject.meshMargin Bonden_US
dc.subject.meshResin Cementsen_US
dc.titleLongevity of Crown Margin Repairs Using Glass Ionomer: A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Justin Watson thesis 4-20-2020 pdf.pdf
Size:
1.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: