Foundation Position and Actions in the Multi-national Arena: A Case Study of Ocean Conservation in the Arctic

dc.contributor.advisorPaarlberg, Laurie E.
dc.contributor.authorDanahey Janin, Patricia Clare
dc.contributor.otherShaker, Genevieve G.
dc.contributor.otherBadertscher, Katherine
dc.contributor.otherHellwig, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-07T14:34:19Z
dc.date.available2023-04-07T14:34:19Z
dc.date.issued2023-03
dc.degree.date2023en_US
dc.degree.discipline
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelPh.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study examines private foundation positioning and actions in respect to governance and market considerations in the multi-national arena around the issue of ocean conservation in the empirical setting of the Arctic Ocean. Existing research has focused primarily on foundations in their domestic setting or alternatively in their international engagement within a foreign country. There is evidence that foundation creation and activity addressing global issues are rising. Questions remain around the role of foundations in global governance and their relationship to the market. Using a qualitative case study methodology, this study was guided by a framework based on governance and market. The framework incorporated Young and Frumkin’s conceptualization of government-nonprofit relations enhanced by three additional United Nations ocean-related frameworks, and an orientation toward the market based on empirical studies. Five key actions carried out by foundations were also considered. The study was organized around two ocean conservation policy contexts to see similarities and differences. The research focused on a total of eleven foundation case studies, drawing on data from publicly available documents, grant databases, the observation of public events, and sixteen semi-structured on-line video interviews of experts, foundation, government, and NGO representatives. The study supports the theoretical model demonstrating that foundations generally complemented government activity underway and took adversarial stances at specific decision-making junctures. Foundations were attentive to international frameworks that intersected with their issue area and approach. The study challenges the model due to the difficulty in differentiating the supplemental and complementary positioning. Governance architecture and interlocking policy fields kept foundations from driving the agenda. Primary actions were funding and deploying a variety of non-financial assets. No high-risk funding linked to markets was detected and sustainable market solutions coupled with regulation were favored approaches. Risk mitigation was a primary concern prompting questions around foundation innovation. This research points to factors hindering foundations to take on a key role in governance and the evolving dimensions of the market prompting further research on foundation activity in the multi-national arena. It provides scholars and practitioners insights into theoretical and practical implications for foundations working in complex, politically tense contexts.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/32285
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/3126
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcase studyen_US
dc.subjectglobal governanceen_US
dc.subjectgovernment-nonprofit relationsen_US
dc.subjectinternational frameworksen_US
dc.subjectrisk mitigationen_US
dc.subjectsustainable market solutionsen_US
dc.titleFoundation Position and Actions in the Multi-national Arena: A Case Study of Ocean Conservation in the Arcticen_US
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DanaheyJanin_iupui_0104D_10663.pdf
Size:
2.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: