NATO, Russia and the Ukraine Crisis

dc.contributor.advisorPegg, Scott
dc.contributor.authorFrix, Noëlie
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-18T21:05:28Z
dc.date.available2017-01-18T21:05:28Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.degree.date2016en_US
dc.degree.disciplineDepartment of Political Scienceen
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelM.A.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper seeks to answer the theoretical question: Do international organizations (IOs) bring peace and stability to international relations? The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) serves as a case study which can help answer this query. Initially, it is important to explore what realist and liberal scholars broadly argue on the matter of IOs, peace and stability. NATO as an organization is then examined, followed by the case study of the role it played in the Ukraine crisis. Many international organizations exist today which deal with a wide variety of issues. The League of Nations, though it failed to fulfill its mandate of maintaining worldwide peace, can be considered the first modern international organization and served as the model for its successor, the United Nations. Realists—who argue that states are the principal actor in international relations (IR) and that they are self-interested and mainly concerned with security and power—look upon IOs skeptically. Liberals, though, believe in cooperation among states and promote the proliferation of international organizations, extolling their virtues. The heated debate between these two ideologies is evident in the case of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO) eastward expansion. NATO was originally designed to curb the Soviet threat and protect Western Europe from communist expansion. When the Cold War ended and NATO’s original mandate had therefore expired, liberals championed the continued existence and expansion of the organization. Realists, on the other hand, warned of negative repercussions, as they foresaw that eastward expansion of the alliance would be perceived as a threat by Russia. The 2014 Ukraine crisis provides a good case study which can help determine whether liberals or realists were right. Liberals have claimed that Russian aggression in the region justifies NATO expansion. Realists, however, have argued that it is the very fact of actual and prospective NATO expansion which has caused this aggression in the first place.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7912/C22M1N
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11818
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/663
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjectNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)en_US
dc.subjectRussiaen_US
dc.subjectUkraineen_US
dc.subjectRealisten_US
dc.subjectLiberalen_US
dc.subjectInternational Organizationsen_US
dc.subjectCompetitionen_US
dc.subjectInternational Relationsen_US
dc.subjectIntergovernmental Organizations (IGOs)en_US
dc.subjectNATO Expansionen_US
dc.subjectInstitutionsen_US
dc.subjectRegimesen_US
dc.subjectBaltic Statesen_US
dc.subjectCooperationen_US
dc.titleNATO, Russia and the Ukraine Crisisen_US
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NATO, Russia and the Ukraine Crisis.pdf
Size:
778.24 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: