Three Essays in Health Economics: The Role of Coordination in Improving Outcomes and Increasing Value in Health Care

Abstract

Hospital costs are the largest contributor to US health expenditures, making them a common target for cost containment policies. Policies that reduce fragmentation in health care and related systems could increase the value of these expenditures while improving outcomes. Efforts to address fragmentation of health care services, such as Accountable Care Organizations, have typically been enacted at the scale of health systems. However, coordination within health care facilities should also be explored. In three essays, I analyze the role of coordination in several forms. First, I examine the introduction of interdisciplinary care teams within a hospital. This analysis features care coordination within a health care facility with the potential to reduce resource utilization through improved communication between team members and between patients and their care providers. I find that care coordination reduced length of stay for some patients while maintaining care quality. This combination results in higher value care for patients and hospitals. Second, I explore whether these interdisciplinary care teams impact resource utilization and patient flow throughout the hospital. The primary outcome is reduction in patient transfers to the ICU. Here, care coordination includes interdisciplinary teams as well as coordination between interdisciplinary teams and intensivists in ICUs. Findings from this analysis suggest that ICU transfers were unaffected by care coordination. Finally, I examine coordination on a larger scale. I leverage data from a national database of trauma patients to compare mortality among adolescent patients with isolated traumatic brain injury between adult trauma centers and pediatric trauma centers. Previous work has shown that younger pediatric patients with this injury benefit from treatment at pediatric trauma centers. However, it is unclear whether this benefit extends to older pediatric patients on the cusp of adulthood. I find that, after adjusting for differences in injury severity, adolescent patients have no difference in mortality risk when treated at adult or pediatric trauma centers. This finding supports the current regionalized model of trauma care where severely injured patients are taken to the nearest trauma center, regardless of designation as pediatric or adult.