Persistence and change in donations received by America's largest charities

dc.contributor.advisorLenkowsky, Leslie
dc.contributor.authorCleveland, William Suhs
dc.contributor.otherGrønbjerg, Kirsten
dc.contributor.otherLyons, Alvin
dc.contributor.otherRooney, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T20:14:38Z
dc.date.available2017-07-04T09:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-07
dc.degree.date2016en_US
dc.degree.disciplineLilly Family School of Philanthropy
dc.degree.grantorIndiana Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelPh.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation explores growth among American charities by examining 25 years of the Philanthropy 400, an annual ranking published by The Chronicle of Philanthropy of the 400 charities receiving the most donations. Data preparation for the Philanthropy 400’s first analysis remedied publication deadline constraints by aligning data by fiscal years and adding 310 charities omitted from the published rankings, resulting in a study population of 1,101 charities. Most studies of charity finance examine individual Forms 990. The Philanthropy 400 uses consolidated financial information from entire organizational networks, creating the same basis for charities filing a single Form 990, like the American Red Cross, and charities with affiliates filing more than 1,000 Forms 990, like Habitat for Humanity. Organizational ecology theory frames examination of aggregate changes in the Philanthropy 400. Two questions examine how age and dependence on donations as a percentage of total income affect persistence in the rankings. A third question examines the changing share of total U.S. giving received by ranked charities. Despite stability resulting from the same charities occupying 189 of the 400 ranking positions every year, the median age of ranked charities decreased. Younger charities generally climbed within the rankings, while older charities tended to decline or exit the rankings. Younger new entrants often persisted in the rankings, suggesting some donors embrace various new causes or solutions. Charities ranked only once or twice decreased in number with each successive ranking. Most charities ranked only once entered the rankings by receiving two or more times their typical amount of donations, suggesting that sustained fundraising programs regularly outperform charities that periodically experience years of extraordinarily high donations. The aggregate inflation-adjusted donations received by the Philanthropy 400 increased during the study period and increased as a percentage of total U.S. giving. As predicted by organizational ecology, the increasing percentage of total U.S. giving received by the Philanthropy 400 coincided with slowing growth in both the number of U.S. charities and total U.S. giving. If the Philanthropy 400 continues to increase its percentage of total U.S. giving, this could affect financing for smaller charities.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7912/C2NG6F
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/11780
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/620
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPhilanthropy 400 rankingen_US
dc.subjectCharitable givingen_US
dc.subjectCharity populationen_US
dc.subjectFinancial concentrationen_US
dc.subjectNonprofit organizationsen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational ecologyen_US
dc.titlePersistence and change in donations received by America's largest charitiesen_US
dc.typeDissertation
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cleveland_iupui_0104D_10160.pdf
Size:
968.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: