Effects of sexting on perceptions of sexual intent, sexual consent, and responsibility in sexual encounters

dc.contributor.advisorCyders, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorDir, Allyson L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-25T18:53:42Z
dc.date.available2017-04-25T18:53:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.degree.date2017en_US
dc.degree.disciplineDepartment of Psychologyen
dc.degree.grantorPurdue Universityen_US
dc.degree.levelPh.D.en_US
dc.descriptionIndiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)en_US
dc.description.abstractSexting has been linked to a range of sexual behaviors, including sexual assault; however, the mechanism through which sexting increases the risk for sexual assault is unknown. One explanation for the role of sexting in sexual assault could be due to gender differences in sexting and sexual communication. The current study examined men’s and women’s perceptions of sexting as a form of communicating sexual intent and sexual consent, and how sexting influences attributions of responsibility and blame in sexual encounters and alleged sexual assault. Additionally, considering the role of alcohol in sexual assault, the study also examined how both sexting and alcohol influenced individuals’ perceptions of a sexual scenario. Method:Using a factorial vignette design, N = 525 college students (48.6% women; 71% Caucasian) were randomly assigned to one of four vignettes regarding a sexual scenario between a man and woman (John and Jennifer), with sexting and/or alcohol involved. Results: Significant differences in sexting vs. texting conditions were seen for perceptions of sexual intent (F = 147.28, p< .01) and sexual consent (F = 105.86, p< .01). Men were more likely to perceive that sexual consent was exchanged (F = 9.16, p< .01) and to interpret the sext as a consent cue (F = 7.82, p< .01). John was attributed more responsibility/blame across all conditions (F = 154.58, p< .01); however, Jennifer was attributed more blame in the sexting conditions (F = 9.16, p< .01). Conclusion: Results suggest that despite sexting as a signal of sexual interest, there are differences in how men and women perceive sexting as sexual consent, which may influence the risk for sexual assault. Additionally, there are differential effects of sexting for men vs. women, such that women may be judged more harshly for sexting, suggesting evidence of the sexual double standard. Results offer important implications for sexual assault prevention and sexual gender roles.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.7912/C20M11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/12329
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.7912/C2/1042
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectsextingen_US
dc.subjectalcoholen_US
dc.subjectsexual assaulten_US
dc.subjectsexual consenten_US
dc.subjectsexual intenten_US
dc.subjectvictim blameen_US
dc.titleEffects of sexting on perceptions of sexual intent, sexual consent, and responsibility in sexual encountersen_US
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Dir dissertation ProQuest.pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: