Cumulative Case Legal Arguments and the Justification of Academic Affirmative Action

dc.contributor.authorWright, R. George
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-14T21:36:20Z
dc.date.available2020-09-14T21:36:20Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractWhen something is true or valuable, we can often give a simple account of why this is so. There may be some single reason or some overwhelming item of evidence that underlies the truth or value in question. Even if we think that there are several different reasons why something is true or valuable, one of those reasons standing alone may establish the point. We might, for example, sufficiently account for the truth of our belief that it suddenly became dark by noting that someone just flicked the light switch. Under other circumstances, we might point instead to the onset of a solar eclipse. These simple explanations are not complete in themselves, but they may be all we need.en_US
dc.identifier.citation23 Pace Law Review 1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/23817
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleCumulative Case Legal Arguments and the Justification of Academic Affirmative Actionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cumulative Case Legal Arguments and the Justification of Academic Affirmative Action.pdf
Size:
5.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: