Exploring Dual-Targeting GroEL/ES & PtpB Inhibitors as a New Antibiotic Strategy for Tuberculosis
Date
Authors
Language
Embargo Lift Date
Department
Committee Chair
Committee Members
Degree
Degree Year
Department
Grantor
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Found At
Abstract
Current Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) treatments suffer from an increase in antibiotic resistance strains and the lack of efficacy against latent state tuberculosis, thus novel approaches targeting different mechanisms of action are needed. One strategy to target Mtb is to target protein homeostasis pathways by inhibiting molecular chaperones, in particular, GroEL/ES (HSP60/10) chaperonin systems. Mtb has two homologs of GroEL, of which GroEL1 is not essential, but is important for cytokine-dependent granuloma formation, and GroEL2 is essential for survival and the likely canonical housekeeping chaperonin. Another strategy to target Mtb is to target the protein tyrosine phosphatase B (PtpB) virulence factor that Mtb secretes into host cells to help evade immune responses. Thus, we envisioned that this analog series might also be capable of inhibiting Mtb PtpB along with GroEL. By developing compound 1 inhibitors that could act on all of GroEL1, GroEL2, and PtpB, we could have an antibiotic candidate that targets all stages of tuberculosis: actively replicating bacteria, bacteria evading host cell immune response, and granuloma formation in latent disease. In the Johnson lab, previous studies explored GroEL/ES inhibitors, with compound 1 being one of the most potent inhibitors, inhibiting both Trypanosoma brucei and Staphylococcus aureus proliferation. In the present study, we have screened previously developed compound 1 analogs, as well as a series of newly synthesized analogs that we term “half-molecules”. In this study, our results indicated two potential avenues to explore for future research. The first is a series of carboxyl-bearing compound 1 inhibitors, compounds 2m-o, 2m-m, and 2m-p, which act solely on Mtb PtpB phosphatase activity without inhibiting GroEL. The second is a series of compound 1 inhibitors (e.g. 20R and 20L) that are able to inhibit both the PtpB phosphatase and GroEL/ES chaperonin system. Thus, this exploratory study showed the possibility of pursuing such a polypharmacological antibiotic strategy against Mtb infections and with further optimization, such dual-targeting GroEL/ES and PtpB inhibitors could be effective against all stages of tuberculosis.