On Perfect Goodness

dc.contributor.authorKeller, J. Gregory
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-22T22:03:08Z
dc.date.available2013-01-22T22:03:08Z
dc.date.issued2010-04
dc.description.abstractGod is typically conceived as perfectly good and necessarily so, in two senses: in terms of always performing the best possible act and in terms of having maximal moral worth. Yet any being that freely performs the best act she can must be accorded greater moral worth for any such action than a being that does so necessarily. I conclude that any being that performs the best possible act of necessity cannot also have maximal moral worth, making the concept of God’s perfect goodness incoherent.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKeller, J. Gregory. "On Perfect Goodness." Sophia 49.1 (2010): 29-36.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0038-1527
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/3207
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_US
dc.subjectGoden_US
dc.subjectDivine Goodnessen_US
dc.subjectDivine Perfectionen_US
dc.titleOn Perfect Goodnessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
On_Perfect_Goodness.pdf
Size:
127.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.88 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: