Blood Sacrifice and the Myth of the Fallen Muslim Soldier in US Presidential Elections after 9/11

dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Edward E., IV
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T18:14:07Z
dc.date.available2023-09-25T18:14:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractOne ultimate sign of political assimilation is the willingness of citizens to sacrifice themselves in battle for their nation. This chapter reveals the promise and limits of US liberalism by examining how the blood sacrifice of two fallen soldiers—Kareem Khan and Humayun Khan—was imagined in mythic terms during the US presidential elections of 2008 and 2016. The chapter argues that in focusing on the incorporation of foreign Muslim blood into the nation, American politicians offered a partial, ambiguous acceptance—one that both included and excluded Muslims from the American body politic. It explains how the racialization of Muslim Americans render even sacred acts of assimilation ineffective in the struggle for political assimilation.
dc.identifier.citationCurtis, E. E., IV. (2019). Blood Sacrifice and the Myth of the Fallen Muslim Soldier in US Presidential Elections after 9/11. In Muslim American Politics and the Future of US Democracy (pp. 121–142). New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479875009.003.0006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1805/35783
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNew York University Press
dc.relation.isversionof10.18574/nyu/9781479875009.003.0006
dc.subjectSacrifice
dc.subjectMyth
dc.subjectElection
dc.subjectHumayun Khan
dc.subjectKareem Khan
dc.titleBlood Sacrifice and the Myth of the Fallen Muslim Soldier in US Presidential Elections after 9/11
dc.typeBook chapter
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Curtis2019Blood-AAM.pdf
Size:
230.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.99 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: